XUU-U.TO vs. VGT
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU-U.TO) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT).
XUU-U.TO and VGT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XUU-U.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Total Market Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2019. VGT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. Both XUU-U.TO and VGT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XUU-U.TO or VGT.
Key characteristics
| XUU-U.TO | VGT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 24.69% | 29.40% |
| 1Y Return | 38.10% | 41.46% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.63% | 12.41% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 15.16% | 23.00% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.09 | 1.94 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.72 | 2.51 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.76 | 1.35 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.56 | 2.68 |
| Martin Ratio | 21.97 | 9.65 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.73% | 4.22% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.34% | 20.96% |
| Max Drawdown | -28.65% | -54.63% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -0.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUU-U.TO and VGT is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
XUU-U.TO vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XUU-U.TO achieves a 24.69% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 29.40% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XUU-U.TO vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XUU-U.TO has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than VGT's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XUU-U.TO vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU-U.TO) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XUU-U.TO vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
XUU-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than VGT's 0.60% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XUU-U.TO iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF | 0.54% | 0.89% | 1.08% | 0.79% | 0.95% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% | 1.12% | 1.05% |
Drawdowns
XUU-U.TO vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUU-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.65%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUU-U.TO and VGT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XUU-U.TO vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU-U.TO) is 4.67%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 6.28%. This indicates that XUU-U.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.