XUS-U.TO vs. VFVA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS-U.TO) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA).
XUS-U.TO and VFVA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XUS-U.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2019. VFVA is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Feb 13, 2018.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XUS-U.TO or VFVA.
Key characteristics
| XUS-U.TO | VFVA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 21.32% | 7.85% |
| 1Y Return | 33.99% | 21.77% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.71% | 6.43% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 16.61% | 12.22% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.04 | 1.49 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.08 | 2.16 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.57 | 1.27 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.34 | 2.31 |
| Martin Ratio | 20.08 | 7.19 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.76% | 3.40% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.60% | 16.32% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.54% | -48.58% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.62% | -3.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUS-U.TO and VFVA is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XUS-U.TO vs. VFVA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XUS-U.TO achieves a 21.32% return, which is significantly higher than VFVA's 7.85% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XUS-U.TO vs. VFVA - Expense Ratio Comparison
XUS-U.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than VFVA's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XUS-U.TO vs. VFVA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS-U.TO) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XUS-U.TO vs. VFVA - Dividend Comparison
XUS-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than VFVA's 2.37% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XUS-U.TO iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF | 1.50% | 1.81% | 2.10% | 1.57% | 1.96% | 1.79% | 0.00% |
VFVA Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF | 2.37% | 2.45% | 2.21% | 1.68% | 2.04% | 2.08% | 1.65% |
Drawdowns
XUS-U.TO vs. VFVA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUS-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.54%, smaller than the maximum VFVA drawdown of -48.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUS-U.TO and VFVA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XUS-U.TO vs. VFVA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS-U.TO) is 3.03%, while Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) has a volatility of 3.58%. This indicates that XUS-U.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.