XTR vs. IVV
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV).
XTR and IVV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XTR is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021. IVV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 15, 2000. Both XTR and IVV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XTR or IVV.
Key characteristics
| XTR | IVV | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 9.59% | 10.47% |
| 1Y Return | 25.71% | 28.71% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.45 | 2.52 |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.63% | 11.54% |
| Max Drawdown | -20.83% | -55.25% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.35% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between XTR and IVV is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XTR vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XTR achieves a 9.59% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 10.47% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XTR vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XTR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XTR vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XTR vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
XTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than IVV's 1.31% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTR Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF | 1.00% | 1.09% | 1.08% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.31% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.99% | 2.20% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.26% | 1.82% | 1.80% |
Drawdowns
XTR vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTR drawdown since its inception was -20.83%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTR and IVV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XTR vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) is 2.97%, while iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a volatility of 3.36%. This indicates that XTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.