PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTL vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTL vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTL achieves a 62.17% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 65.71% return. Over the past 10 years, XTL has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 16.95%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.44% annualized return.


XTL

1D
3.28%
1M
8.43%
YTD
62.17%
6M
70.46%
1Y
143.57%
3Y*
50.79%
5Y*
20.95%
10Y*
16.95%

TQQQ

1D
1.37%
1M
33.57%
YTD
65.71%
6M
58.23%
1Y
145.30%
3Y*
69.92%
5Y*
29.86%
10Y*
45.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTL vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XTL
SPDR S&P Telecom ETF
62.17%44.95%34.89%-1.17%-19.18%21.58%22.46%12.51%-6.60%0.56%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
65.71%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between XTL and TQQQ is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2011

0.65

The correlation between XTL and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

XTL vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XTL
TQQQ

Technology

61.4%
53.8%

Communication Services

36.1%
15.8%

Real Estate

2.6%
0.1%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Industrials

-

2.8%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Technology

XTL
61.4%
TQQQ
53.8%

Communication Services

XTL
36.1%
TQQQ
15.8%

Real Estate

XTL
2.6%
TQQQ
0.1%

Basic Materials

XTL

-

TQQQ
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XTL

-

TQQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

XTL

-

TQQQ
7.7%

Energy

XTL

-

TQQQ
0.6%

Financial Services

XTL

-

TQQQ
0.2%

Healthcare

XTL

-

TQQQ
4.2%

Industrials

XTL

-

TQQQ
2.8%

Utilities

XTL

-

TQQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTL vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTL
XTL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
XTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTL Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
XTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTL vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XTLTQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

5.02

3.07

+1.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.29

3.19

+2.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.42

+0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

9.91

4.08

+5.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

45.66

13.38

+32.28

XTL vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTL Sharpe Ratio is 5.02, which is higher than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTL and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XTLTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.02

3.07

+1.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.45

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.69

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.74

-0.20

Drawdowns

XTL vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTL drawdown since its inception was -37.01%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTL and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTLTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.01%

-81.66%

+44.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.70%

-36.97%

+22.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.79%

-58.04%

+35.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.01%

-81.66%

+44.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.01%

-81.66%

+44.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.77%

-18.53%

+8.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

11.28%

-8.09%

Volatility

XTL vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) is 8.05%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 13.26%. This indicates that XTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTLTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.05%

13.26%

-5.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.61%

36.05%

-13.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.78%

47.63%

-18.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.04%

66.55%

-41.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.51%

65.98%

-42.47%

XTL vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

XTL vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

XTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.36%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%
XTL
SPDR S&P Telecom ETF
0.80%1.05%0.62%0.80%0.74%1.25%0.88%0.92%1.90%2.08%1.11%1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


XTL and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (13.26%) compared to XTL (8.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTL dropped -37.01% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 45.44% vs 16.95% for XTL. On fees, XTL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XTL has been the lower-risk option at 8.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 45.44% return vs 16.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

XTL has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.

XTL is categorized as Communications Equities, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. XTL tracks S&P Telecom Select Industry Index, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XTL and 0.95% for TQQQ.

XTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.02 vs 3.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTL and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer