XT vs. RBOT
XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net), while RBOT (Vicarious Surgical Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, XT returned 8.42%/yr vs -70.45%/yr for RBOT. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XT vs. RBOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XT achieves a 20.20% return, which is significantly higher than RBOT's -69.15% return.
XT
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 9.47%
- YTD
- 20.20%
- 6M
- 20.54%
- 1Y
- 45.88%
- 3Y*
- 18.83%
- 5Y*
- 8.42%
- 10Y*
- 14.70%
RBOT
- 1D
- -10.13%
- 1M
- -25.53%
- YTD
- -69.15%
- 6M
- -79.71%
- 1Y
- -90.69%
- 3Y*
- -78.35%
- 5Y*
- -70.45%
- 10Y*
- —
XT vs. RBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 20.20% | 26.28% | 0.29% | 27.02% | -27.83% | 16.43% | 18.91% |
RBOT Vicarious Surgical Inc. | -69.15% | -83.51% | 19.63% | -81.85% | -80.98% | 4.53% | 4.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between XT and RBOT is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2020 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XT vs. RBOT — Risk / Return Rank
XT
RBOT
XT vs. RBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) and Vicarious Surgical Inc. (RBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XT | RBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 0.72 | +0.77 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.41 | -0.50 | +4.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.51 | -0.75 | +19.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XT | RBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89 | -0.83 | +3.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | -0.45 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | -0.42 | +1.08 |
Drawdowns
XT vs. RBOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XT drawdown since its inception was -34.41%, smaller than the maximum RBOT drawdown of -99.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XT and RBOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XT | RBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.41% | -99.85% | +65.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.45% | -94.92% | +84.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.09% | -99.03% | +76.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.41% | -99.85% | +65.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | -99.85% | +99.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.41% | -69.76% | +62.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 33.00% | -30.51% |
Volatility
XT vs. RBOT - Volatility Comparison
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) has a higher volatility of 4.85% compared to Vicarious Surgical Inc. (RBOT) at 2.51%. This indicates that XT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XT | RBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.85% | 2.51% | +2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.94% | 82.40% | -70.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.99% | 124.73% | -108.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 114.18% | -93.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.08% | 106.27% | -86.19% |
Dividends
XT vs. RBOT - Dividend Comparison
XT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%, while RBOT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBOT Vicarious Surgical Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 6.61% | 7.95% | 0.66% | 0.41% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 1.55% | 1.40% | 0.97% | 1.37% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XT and RBOT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XT has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to RBOT (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XT dropped -34.41% vs RBOT's -99.85%.
XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XT and RBOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer