PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XT vs. GINN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XT vs. GINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XT achieves a 15.68% return, which is significantly higher than GINN's 9.33% return.


XT

1D
0.94%
1M
-2.33%
6M
11.05%
YTD
15.68%
1Y
33.19%
3Y*
16.27%
5Y*
6.52%
10Y*
13.72%
ALL TIME*
12.32%

GINN

1D
1.55%
1M
1.06%
6M
7.30%
YTD
9.33%
1Y
21.13%
3Y*
18.35%
5Y*
6.21%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$141.87K$128.01K$214.74K
$6.36M$6.26M$10.28M

XT vs. GINN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
15.68%26.28%0.29%27.02%-27.83%16.43%10.51%
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
9.33%20.25%18.71%29.94%-32.40%10.39%8.08%

Correlation

The correlation between XT and GINN is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2020

0.94

The correlation between XT and GINN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

XT vs. GINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XT
GINN

Technology

42.9%
33.0%

Healthcare

28.5%
22.0%

Industrials

8.0%
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
12.2%

Utilities

4.9%
1.7%

Communication Services

4.0%
9.6%

Financial Services

3.2%
12.5%

Basic Materials

1.5%
0.1%

Energy

0.1%
1.3%

Real Estate

0.0%
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
1.7%

Technology

XT
42.9%
GINN
33.0%

Healthcare

XT
28.5%
GINN
22.0%

Industrials

XT
8.0%
GINN
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XT
6.7%
GINN
12.2%

Utilities

XT
4.9%
GINN
1.7%

Communication Services

XT
4.0%
GINN
9.6%

Financial Services

XT
3.2%
GINN
12.5%

Basic Materials

XT
1.5%
GINN
0.1%

Energy

XT
0.1%
GINN
1.3%

Real Estate

XT
0.0%
GINN
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

XT
0.0%
GINN
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XT vs. GINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XT
XT Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XT Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
XT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

GINN
GINN Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XT vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XTGINNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.22

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

1.61

+1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.45

5.47

+5.98

XT vs. GINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XT Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the GINN Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XT and GINN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XT vs. GINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XT drawdown since its inception was -34.41%, smaller than the maximum GINN drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XT and GINN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTGINNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.41%

-41.25%

+6.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.45%

-13.18%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.09%

-22.25%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.41%

-41.25%

+6.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.22%

-1.00%

-3.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.35%

-13.08%

+5.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

3.87%

-0.97%

Volatility

XT vs. GINN - Volatility Comparison

iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) at 4.15%. This indicates that XT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTGINNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.03%

4.15%

+0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.41%

13.00%

+1.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.83%

16.63%

+1.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.09%

21.45%

-0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.13%

20.95%

-0.82%

XT vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

XT has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

XT vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison

XT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.08%, more than GINN's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
1.15%1.26%1.26%1.01%0.69%0.67%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XT
iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
7.08%7.95%0.66%0.41%0.78%0.84%0.77%1.55%1.40%0.97%1.37%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


XT and GINN have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XT has higher volatility (5.03%) compared to GINN (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XT dropped -34.41% vs GINN's -41.25%.

On 5-year performance, XT leads with 6.52% vs 6.21% for GINN. On fees, XT is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, GINN has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XT has performed better with a 6.52% return vs 6.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XT is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GINN.

XT has the higher dividend yield at 7.08%, compared with 1.15% for GINN.

XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net), while GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for XT and 0.50% for GINN.

XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XT and GINN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer