XSVM vs. SPY
XSVM (Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSVM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSVM returned 12.72%/yr vs 15.49%/yr for SPY. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSVM charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
XSVM vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSVM achieves a 16.87% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, XSVM has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 12.72%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.49% annualized return.
XSVM
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 16.68%
- 1Y
- 34.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.99%
- 5Y*
- 6.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
SPY
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
XSVM vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 16.87% | 7.47% | 2.30% | 20.20% | -13.63% | 56.36% | 5.08% | 30.01% | -12.33% | 3.62% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSVM and SPY is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2005 | 0.76 |
The correlation between XSVM and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XSVM vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSVM
SPY
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Real Estate
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Utilities
Financial Services
XSVM
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
XSVM
SPY
Energy
XSVM
SPY
Technology
XSVM
SPY
Consumer Defensive
XSVM
SPY
Industrials
XSVM
SPY
Real Estate
XSVM
SPY
Communication Services
XSVM
SPY
Basic Materials
XSVM
SPY
Healthcare
XSVM
SPY
Utilities
XSVM
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSVM vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
XSVM
SPY
XSVM vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSVM | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.43 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 3.16 | +0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.66 | 14.72 | -4.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSVM | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 2.38 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.82 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.87 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.59 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
XSVM vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSVM drawdown since its inception was -62.57%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSVM and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSVM | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.57% | -55.19% | -7.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -8.88% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.21% | -18.76% | -7.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.21% | -24.50% | -1.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.02% | -33.72% | -15.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | -0.70% | -0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.57% | -9.05% | -2.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 1.91% | +1.36% |
Volatility
XSVM vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.84%. This indicates that XSVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSVM | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.24% | 2.84% | +2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.05% | 8.90% | +3.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.59% | 11.83% | +6.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.71% | 17.05% | +5.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.09% | 17.94% | +7.15% |
XSVM vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSVM has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSVM vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
XSVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than SPY's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 1.81% | 2.29% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.23% | 1.21% | 1.22% | 2.54% | 1.90% | 2.29% | 2.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSVM and SPY have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSVM has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to SPY (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSVM dropped -62.57% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.49% vs 12.72% for XSVM. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.49% return vs 12.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for XSVM.
XSVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.81%, compared with 0.98% for SPY.
XSVM is categorized as Momentum, while SPY is S&P 500. XSVM tracks S&P SmallCap 600 High Momentum Value Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for XSVM and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSVM and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer