XSUS.TO vs. XDIV.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Index ETF (XSUS.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO).
XSUS.TO and XDIV.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XSUS.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Extended ESG Focus Index. It was launched on Mar 18, 2019. XDIV.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index. It was launched on Jun 12, 2017. Both XSUS.TO and XDIV.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XSUS.TO or XDIV.TO.
Key characteristics
XSUS.TO | XDIV.TO | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 33.45% | 23.62% |
1Y Return | 40.54% | 30.81% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 12.42% | 12.42% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 17.16% | 11.36% |
Sharpe Ratio | 3.45 | 3.57 |
Sortino Ratio | 4.81 | 5.06 |
Omega Ratio | 1.68 | 1.68 |
Calmar Ratio | 5.11 | 5.83 |
Martin Ratio | 24.93 | 19.96 |
Ulcer Index | 1.58% | 1.61% |
Daily Std Dev | 11.44% | 8.99% |
Max Drawdown | -28.32% | -41.29% |
Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSUS.TO and XDIV.TO is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XSUS.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XSUS.TO achieves a 33.45% return, which is significantly higher than XDIV.TO's 23.62% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XSUS.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSUS.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than XDIV.TO's 0.11% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XSUS.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Index ETF (XSUS.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XSUS.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison
XSUS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than XDIV.TO's 4.34% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Index ETF | 0.85% | 1.13% | 1.00% | 0.86% | 0.95% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF | 4.34% | 4.42% | 4.15% | 3.76% | 4.82% | 4.22% | 5.10% | 1.91% |
Drawdowns
XSUS.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSUS.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.32%, smaller than the maximum XDIV.TO drawdown of -41.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSUS.TO and XDIV.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XSUS.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Index ETF (XSUS.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO) at 2.90%. This indicates that XSUS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.