XSPX.L vs. URTH
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XSPX.L) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH).
XSPX.L and URTH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XSPX.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Mar 26, 2010. URTH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index. It was launched on Jan 10, 2012. Both XSPX.L and URTH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XSPX.L or URTH.
Key characteristics
XSPX.L | URTH | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 18.74% | 16.82% |
1Y Return | 26.78% | 28.49% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 9.73% | 5.94% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 14.78% | 11.96% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 15.06% | 10.02% |
Sharpe Ratio | 2.52 | 2.54 |
Sortino Ratio | 3.50 | 3.46 |
Omega Ratio | 1.48 | 1.47 |
Calmar Ratio | 4.21 | 3.49 |
Martin Ratio | 16.98 | 16.20 |
Ulcer Index | 1.59% | 1.84% |
Daily Std Dev | 10.69% | 11.70% |
Max Drawdown | -25.50% | -34.01% |
Current Drawdown | -1.95% | -2.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSPX.L and URTH is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XSPX.L vs. URTH - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XSPX.L achieves a 18.74% return, which is significantly higher than URTH's 16.82% return. Over the past 10 years, XSPX.L has outperformed URTH with an annualized return of 15.06%, while URTH has yielded a comparatively lower 10.02% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XSPX.L vs. URTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSPX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than URTH's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XSPX.L vs. URTH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XSPX.L) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XSPX.L vs. URTH - Dividend Comparison
XSPX.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
iShares MSCI World ETF | 1.48% | 1.70% | 1.68% | 1.50% | 1.52% | 2.16% | 2.30% | 1.88% | 2.15% | 2.35% | 2.31% | 1.04% |
Drawdowns
XSPX.L vs. URTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSPX.L drawdown since its inception was -25.50%, smaller than the maximum URTH drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSPX.L and URTH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XSPX.L vs. URTH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XSPX.L) is 2.33%, while iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) has a volatility of 2.91%. This indicates that XSPX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.