PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSHD vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XSHD vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (XSHD) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSHD achieves a 9.24% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 7.60% return.


XSHD

1D
1.34%
1M
1.12%
YTD
9.24%
6M
9.16%
1Y
6.83%
3Y*
2.49%
5Y*
-4.65%
10Y*

^GSPC

1D
-1.44%
1M
-1.45%
YTD
7.60%
6M
6.59%
1Y
22.24%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
13.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSHD vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSHD
Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
9.24%-6.41%-5.25%3.00%-19.48%18.31%-13.55%17.91%-7.86%1.52%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
7.60%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between XSHD and ^GSPC is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2016

0.61

The correlation between XSHD and ^GSPC shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSHD vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSHD
XSHD Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
XSHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSHD Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
XSHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSHD Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSHD vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (XSHD) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XSHD^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.32

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

2.46

-1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.76

10.92

-9.16

XSHD vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSHD Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSHD and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XSHD vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSHD drawdown since its inception was -49.53%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSHD and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSHD^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.53%

-56.78%

+7.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.51%

-9.10%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.77%

-18.90%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.70%

-25.43%

-9.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.92%

-3.21%

-20.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.40%

-10.71%

-5.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.89%

2.04%

+1.85%

Volatility

XSHD vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (XSHD) is 3.90%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that XSHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSHD^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

4.89%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.97%

9.93%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.93%

12.57%

+2.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.85%

17.00%

+1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.20%

18.08%

+4.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSHD and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

^GSPC has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to XSHD (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSHD dropped -49.53% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSHD and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer