XSH.TO vs. PULS
XSH.TO (iShares Core Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond Index ETF) and PULS (PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSH.TO is a Canadian Government Bonds fund tracking the Morningstar Can 1-5Y Core Bd GR CAD, while PULS is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PGIM. XSH.TO is passively managed, while PULS is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSH.TO returned 2.93%/yr vs 7.15%/yr for PULS. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XSH.TO charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for PULS.
Performance
XSH.TO vs. PULS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XSH.TO is traded in CAD, while PULS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PULS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSH.TO achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly lower than PULS's 5.41% return.
XSH.TO
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 1.45%
- 1Y
- 3.79%
- 3Y*
- 6.23%
- 5Y*
- 2.93%
- 10Y*
- 2.83%
PULS
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 5.41%
- 6M
- 5.14%
- 1Y
- 7.78%
- 3Y*
- 8.17%
- 5Y*
- 7.15%
- 10Y*
- —
XSH.TO vs. PULS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSH.TO iShares Core Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond Index ETF | 1.44% | 4.61% | 7.11% | 6.80% | -4.52% | -0.81% | 6.28% | 5.02% | 1.29% |
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 5.41% | 0.18% | 15.11% | 3.73% | 7.95% | 0.43% | -0.94% | -1.28% | 9.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSH.TO and PULS is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2018 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSH.TO vs. PULS — Risk / Return Rank
XSH.TO
PULS
XSH.TO vs. PULS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond Index ETF (XSH.TO) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSH.TO | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.32 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 2.21 | +0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.90 | 6.09 | +3.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSH.TO vs. PULS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSH.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.24%, which is greater than PULS's maximum drawdown of -12.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSH.TO and PULS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSH.TO | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.24% | -12.82% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.51% | -3.53% | +2.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.51% | -6.14% | +4.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.80% | -6.14% | -1.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.05% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.92% | -3.24% | +2.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.38% | 1.28% | -0.90% |
Volatility
XSH.TO vs. PULS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond Index ETF (XSH.TO) is 0.58%, while PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) has a volatility of 1.13%. This indicates that XSH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PULS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSH.TO | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.58% | 1.13% | -0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.80% | 3.30% | -1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19% | 4.45% | -2.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.84% | 6.35% | -3.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.42% | 6.52% | -2.10% |
XSH.TO vs. PULS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSH.TO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than PULS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XSH.TO vs. PULS - Dividend Comparison
XSH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, less than PULS's 4.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 4.57% | 4.78% | 5.62% | 5.48% | 2.30% | 1.19% | 1.85% | 2.69% | 1.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSH.TO iShares Core Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond Index ETF | 3.89% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.24% | 2.97% | 2.65% | 2.61% | 2.80% | 2.86% | 2.93% | 3.08% | 3.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSH.TO and PULS have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XSH.TO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSH.TO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for PULS.
XSH.TO is categorized as Canadian Government Bonds, while PULS is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for XSH.TO and 0.15% for PULS.
Find the right allocation for XSH.TO and PULS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer