XSD vs. CQQQ
XSD (SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF) and CQQQ (Invesco China Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSD is a Semiconductors fund tracking the S&P Semiconductor Select Industry, while CQQQ is a China Equities fund tracking the AlphaShares China Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XSD returned 31.10%/yr vs 5.40%/yr for CQQQ. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for CQQQ.
Performance
XSD vs. CQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSD achieves a 102.14% return, which is significantly higher than CQQQ's 2.46% return. Over the past 10 years, XSD has outperformed CQQQ with an annualized return of 31.10%, while CQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.40% annualized return.
XSD
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- 30.91%
- YTD
- 102.14%
- 6M
- 92.84%
- 1Y
- 180.25%
- 3Y*
- 46.41%
- 5Y*
- 29.69%
- 10Y*
- 31.10%
CQQQ
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- 4.43%
- YTD
- 2.46%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 32.76%
- 3Y*
- 10.55%
- 5Y*
- -7.50%
- 10Y*
- 5.40%
XSD vs. CQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSD SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 102.14% | 29.85% | 10.75% | 34.87% | -30.92% | 42.54% | 61.95% | 64.66% | -6.35% | 25.21% |
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF | 2.46% | 34.96% | 9.84% | -16.71% | -30.09% | -24.54% | 57.33% | 33.57% | -34.77% | 74.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSD and CQQQ is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2009 | 0.54 |
The correlation between XSD and CQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (3 years) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XSD vs. CQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSD
CQQQ
Technology
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XSD
CQQQ
Energy
XSD
CQQQ
-
Basic Materials
XSD
-
CQQQ
Communication Services
XSD
-
CQQQ
Consumer Cyclical
XSD
-
CQQQ
Consumer Defensive
XSD
-
CQQQ
-
Financial Services
XSD
-
CQQQ
Healthcare
XSD
-
CQQQ
-
Industrials
XSD
-
CQQQ
Real Estate
XSD
-
CQQQ
-
Utilities
XSD
-
CQQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSD vs. CQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
XSD
CQQQ
XSD vs. CQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XSD | CQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 1.20 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.75 | 1.35 | +8.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 33.91 | 3.16 | +30.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XSD | CQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.00 | 1.11 | +3.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | -0.20 | +0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | 0.16 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.19 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
XSD vs. CQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSD drawdown since its inception was -64.56%, smaller than the maximum CQQQ drawdown of -73.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSD and CQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSD | CQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.56% | -73.99% | +9.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.61% | -24.41% | +5.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.25% | -35.93% | -5.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.27% | -66.96% | +24.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.27% | -73.99% | +31.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -49.18% | +49.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.74% | -28.29% | +14.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.34% | 10.39% | -5.05% |
Volatility
XSD vs. CQQQ - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) has a higher volatility of 14.94% compared to Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) at 11.60%. This indicates that XSD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSD | CQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.94% | 11.60% | +3.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.89% | 21.88% | +6.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.39% | 29.78% | +6.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.25% | 38.02% | +0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.96% | 33.30% | +1.66% |
XSD vs. CQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CQQQ's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSD vs. CQQQ - Dividend Comparison
XSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than CQQQ's 2.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF | 2.11% | 2.17% | 0.28% | 0.55% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 0.01% | 0.43% | 1.41% | 1.69% | 1.77% |
XSD SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 0.12% | 0.26% | 0.20% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.10% | 0.26% | 0.51% | 1.16% | 0.59% | 0.64% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSD and CQQQ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSD has higher volatility (14.94%) compared to CQQQ (11.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSD dropped -64.56% vs CQQQ's -73.99%.
On 10-year performance, XSD leads with 31.10% vs 5.40% for CQQQ. On fees, XSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 11.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XSD has performed better with a 31.10% return vs 5.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CQQQ.
CQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 0.12% for XSD.
XSD is categorized as Semiconductors, while CQQQ is China Equities. XSD tracks S&P Semiconductor Select Industry, while CQQQ tracks AlphaShares China Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSD and 0.70% for CQQQ.
XSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.00 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSD and CQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer