PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XSD vs. CQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XSD vs. CQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XSD achieves a 102.14% return, which is significantly higher than CQQQ's 2.46% return. Over the past 10 years, XSD has outperformed CQQQ with an annualized return of 31.10%, while CQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.40% annualized return.


XSD

1D
1.51%
1M
30.91%
YTD
102.14%
6M
92.84%
1Y
180.25%
3Y*
46.41%
5Y*
29.69%
10Y*
31.10%

CQQQ

1D
-1.50%
1M
4.43%
YTD
2.46%
6M
5.43%
1Y
32.76%
3Y*
10.55%
5Y*
-7.50%
10Y*
5.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XSD vs. CQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XSD
SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF
102.14%29.85%10.75%34.87%-30.92%42.54%61.95%64.66%-6.35%25.21%
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
2.46%34.96%9.84%-16.71%-30.09%-24.54%57.33%33.57%-34.77%74.31%

Correlation

The correlation between XSD and CQQQ is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2009

0.54

The correlation between XSD and CQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (3 years) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XSD vs. CQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XSD
CQQQ

Technology

97.8%
58.2%

Energy

2.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

0.1%

Communication Services

-

21.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

13.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

1.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XSD
97.8%
CQQQ
58.2%

Energy

XSD
2.2%
CQQQ

-

Basic Materials

XSD

-

CQQQ
0.1%

Communication Services

XSD

-

CQQQ
21.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XSD

-

CQQQ
13.8%

Consumer Defensive

XSD

-

CQQQ

-

Financial Services

XSD

-

CQQQ
0.1%

Healthcare

XSD

-

CQQQ

-

Industrials

XSD

-

CQQQ
1.3%

Real Estate

XSD

-

CQQQ

-

Utilities

XSD

-

CQQQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XSD vs. CQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XSD
XSD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
XSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSD Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
XSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSD Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

CQQQ
CQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
CQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
CQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
CQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XSD vs. CQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XSDCQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.20

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.75

1.35

+8.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

33.91

3.16

+30.74

XSD vs. CQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XSD Sharpe Ratio is 5.00, which is higher than the CQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XSD and CQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XSDCQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.00

1.11

+3.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

-0.20

+0.98

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.16

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.19

+0.25

Drawdowns

XSD vs. CQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XSD drawdown since its inception was -64.56%, smaller than the maximum CQQQ drawdown of -73.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSD and CQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XSDCQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.56%

-73.99%

+9.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.61%

-24.41%

+5.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.25%

-35.93%

-5.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.27%

-66.96%

+24.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.27%

-73.99%

+31.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-49.18%

+49.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.74%

-28.29%

+14.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.34%

10.39%

-5.05%

Volatility

XSD vs. CQQQ - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) has a higher volatility of 14.94% compared to Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) at 11.60%. This indicates that XSD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XSDCQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.94%

11.60%

+3.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.89%

21.88%

+6.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.39%

29.78%

+6.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.25%

38.02%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.96%

33.30%

+1.66%

XSD vs. CQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XSD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CQQQ's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

XSD vs. CQQQ - Dividend Comparison

XSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than CQQQ's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
2.11%2.17%0.28%0.55%0.08%0.00%0.47%0.01%0.43%1.41%1.69%1.77%
XSD
SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF
0.12%0.26%0.20%0.31%0.44%0.10%0.26%0.51%1.16%0.59%0.64%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


XSD and CQQQ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XSD has higher volatility (14.94%) compared to CQQQ (11.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSD dropped -64.56% vs CQQQ's -73.99%.

On 10-year performance, XSD leads with 31.10% vs 5.40% for CQQQ. On fees, XSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 11.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XSD has performed better with a 31.10% return vs 5.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CQQQ.

CQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 0.12% for XSD.

XSD is categorized as Semiconductors, while CQQQ is China Equities. XSD tracks S&P Semiconductor Select Industry, while CQQQ tracks AlphaShares China Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSD and 0.70% for CQQQ.

XSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.00 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XSD and CQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer