XSD vs. BOTZ
XSD (SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XSD is a Semiconductors fund tracking the S&P Semiconductor Select Industry Index, while BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XSD returned 26.73%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for BOTZ. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XSD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.
Performance
XSD vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XSD achieves a 87.88% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 1.13% return.
XSD
- 1D
- -6.88%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- 87.88%
- 6M
- 83.00%
- 1Y
- 147.65%
- 3Y*
- 43.10%
- 5Y*
- 26.73%
- 10Y*
- 30.69%
BOTZ
- 1D
- -4.41%
- 1M
- -9.06%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 20.00%
- 3Y*
- 9.83%
- 5Y*
- 1.10%
- 10Y*
- —
XSD vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XSD SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 87.88% | 29.85% | 10.75% | 34.87% | -30.92% | 42.54% | 61.95% | 64.66% | -6.35% | 25.21% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 1.13% | 14.17% | 12.26% | 38.97% | -42.69% | 8.65% | 51.92% | 31.80% | -28.34% | 58.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between XSD and BOTZ is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2016 | 0.75 |
The correlation between XSD and BOTZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XSD vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XSD
BOTZ
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XSD
BOTZ
Energy
XSD
BOTZ
Basic Materials
XSD
-
BOTZ
Communication Services
XSD
-
BOTZ
Consumer Cyclical
XSD
-
BOTZ
Consumer Defensive
XSD
-
BOTZ
Financial Services
XSD
-
BOTZ
Healthcare
XSD
-
BOTZ
Industrials
XSD
-
BOTZ
Real Estate
XSD
-
BOTZ
-
Utilities
XSD
-
BOTZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XSD vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
XSD
BOTZ
XSD vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XSD | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.15 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.98 | 1.04 | +6.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.27 | 3.34 | +22.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XSD vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XSD drawdown since its inception was -64.56%, which is greater than BOTZ's maximum drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XSD and BOTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XSD | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.56% | -55.54% | -9.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.61% | -19.34% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.25% | -29.02% | -12.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.27% | -55.54% | +13.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.06% | -11.99% | +4.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.72% | -18.27% | +4.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.64% | 6.01% | -0.37% |
Volatility
XSD vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) has a higher volatility of 22.76% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 10.19%. This indicates that XSD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XSD | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.76% | 10.19% | +12.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.53% | 20.13% | +13.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.74% | 25.54% | +15.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.20% | 27.03% | +12.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.44% | 25.83% | +9.61% |
XSD vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XSD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
XSD vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
XSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than BOTZ's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.65% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% | 0.00% |
XSD SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.20% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.10% | 0.26% | 0.51% | 1.16% | 0.59% | 0.64% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XSD and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XSD has higher volatility (22.76%) compared to BOTZ (10.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XSD dropped -64.56% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.
On 5-year performance, XSD leads with 26.73% vs 1.10% for BOTZ. On fees, XSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BOTZ has been the lower-risk option at 10.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XSD has performed better with a 26.73% return vs 1.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.
BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.13% for XSD.
XSD is categorized as Semiconductors, while BOTZ is Robotics. XSD tracks S&P Semiconductor Select Industry Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XSD and 0.68% for BOTZ.
XSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XSD and BOTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer