PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRT vs. VHT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRT vs. VHT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRT achieves a -1.99% return, which is significantly higher than VHT's -4.02% return. Over the past 10 years, XRT has underperformed VHT with an annualized return of 8.56%, while VHT has yielded a comparatively higher 9.26% annualized return.


XRT

1D
-0.39%
1M
-0.29%
YTD
-1.99%
6M
-2.00%
1Y
8.44%
3Y*
13.38%
5Y*
-0.84%
10Y*
8.56%

VHT

1D
0.84%
1M
1.45%
YTD
-4.02%
6M
-4.15%
1Y
14.34%
3Y*
6.14%
5Y*
4.51%
10Y*
9.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRT vs. VHT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XRT
SPDR S&P Retail ETF
-1.99%8.07%11.78%21.53%-31.64%42.60%41.91%14.12%-8.04%4.22%
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
-4.02%15.46%2.66%2.52%-5.60%20.57%18.29%21.87%5.58%23.26%

Correlation

The correlation between XRT and VHT is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2006

0.57

The correlation between XRT and VHT shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XRT vs. VHT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XRT
VHT

Consumer Cyclical

73.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

20.9%

-

Communication Services

1.4%

-

Healthcare

1.4%
100.0%

Technology

1.4%
0.0%

Energy

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Industrials

-

0.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

XRT
73.6%
VHT

-

Consumer Defensive

XRT
20.9%
VHT

-

Communication Services

XRT
1.4%
VHT

-

Healthcare

XRT
1.4%
VHT
100.0%

Technology

XRT
1.4%
VHT
0.0%

Energy

XRT
1.4%
VHT

-

Basic Materials

XRT

-

VHT

-

Financial Services

XRT

-

VHT
0.0%

Industrials

XRT

-

VHT
0.0%

Real Estate

XRT

-

VHT

-

Utilities

XRT

-

VHT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRT vs. VHT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRT
XRT Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
XRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
XRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

VHT
VHT Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHT Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
VHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHT Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRT vs. VHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XRTVHTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.42

1.00

-0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.76

1.57

-0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.18

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

1.38

-0.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.45

3.47

-2.02

XRT vs. VHT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRT Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the VHT Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRT and VHT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XRTVHTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

1.00

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.30

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.55

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.56

-0.21

Drawdowns

XRT vs. VHT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRT drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, which is greater than VHT's maximum drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRT and VHT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRTVHTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.81%

-39.12%

-26.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.53%

-10.40%

-3.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.62%

-16.91%

-8.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.57%

-17.71%

-26.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.02%

-28.85%

-18.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.82%

-7.05%

-6.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.00%

-5.99%

-9.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.85%

4.14%

+1.71%

Volatility

XRT vs. VHT - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) at 4.08%. This indicates that XRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRTVHTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.50%

4.08%

+2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.63%

10.08%

+3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.42%

14.34%

+6.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.90%

14.96%

+11.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.16%

16.94%

+10.22%

XRT vs. VHT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VHT's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

XRT vs. VHT - Dividend Comparison

XRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than VHT's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
1.71%1.61%1.53%1.36%1.33%1.14%1.21%1.89%1.38%1.31%1.45%1.22%
XRT
SPDR S&P Retail ETF
0.83%0.77%1.52%1.40%2.15%1.55%1.01%1.57%1.51%1.52%1.36%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRT and VHT have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XRT has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to VHT (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRT dropped -65.81% vs VHT's -39.12%.

On 10-year performance, VHT leads with 9.26% vs 8.56% for XRT. On fees, VHT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VHT has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VHT has performed better with a 9.26% return vs 8.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VHT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XRT.

VHT has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 0.83% for XRT.

XRT is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while VHT is Health & Biotech Equities. XRT tracks S&P Retail Select Industry, while VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XRT and 0.10% for VHT.

VHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRT and VHT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer