XRT vs. VHT
XRT (SPDR S&P Retail ETF) and VHT (Vanguard Health Care ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRT is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the S&P Retail Select Industry, while VHT is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XRT returned 8.56%/yr vs 9.26%/yr for VHT. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XRT charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VHT.
Performance
XRT vs. VHT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRT achieves a -1.99% return, which is significantly higher than VHT's -4.02% return. Over the past 10 years, XRT has underperformed VHT with an annualized return of 8.56%, while VHT has yielded a comparatively higher 9.26% annualized return.
XRT
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- -1.99%
- 6M
- -2.00%
- 1Y
- 8.44%
- 3Y*
- 13.38%
- 5Y*
- -0.84%
- 10Y*
- 8.56%
VHT
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- -4.02%
- 6M
- -4.15%
- 1Y
- 14.34%
- 3Y*
- 6.14%
- 5Y*
- 4.51%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
XRT vs. VHT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | -1.99% | 8.07% | 11.78% | 21.53% | -31.64% | 42.60% | 41.91% | 14.12% | -8.04% | 4.22% |
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | -4.02% | 15.46% | 2.66% | 2.52% | -5.60% | 20.57% | 18.29% | 21.87% | 5.58% | 23.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRT and VHT is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2006 | 0.57 |
The correlation between XRT and VHT shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XRT vs. VHT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XRT
VHT
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
Technology
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
XRT
VHT
-
Consumer Defensive
XRT
VHT
-
Communication Services
XRT
VHT
-
Healthcare
XRT
VHT
Technology
XRT
VHT
Energy
XRT
VHT
-
Basic Materials
XRT
-
VHT
-
Financial Services
XRT
-
VHT
Industrials
XRT
-
VHT
Real Estate
XRT
-
VHT
-
Utilities
XRT
-
VHT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRT vs. VHT — Risk / Return Rank
XRT
VHT
XRT vs. VHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XRT | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.42 | 1.00 | -0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.76 | 1.57 | -0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.18 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 1.38 | -0.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.45 | 3.47 | -2.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XRT | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | 1.00 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.30 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.55 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.56 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
XRT vs. VHT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRT drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, which is greater than VHT's maximum drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRT and VHT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRT | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.81% | -39.12% | -26.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.53% | -10.40% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.62% | -16.91% | -8.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.57% | -17.71% | -26.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.02% | -28.85% | -18.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.82% | -7.05% | -6.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.00% | -5.99% | -9.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.85% | 4.14% | +1.71% |
Volatility
XRT vs. VHT - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) at 4.08%. This indicates that XRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRT | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 4.08% | +2.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.63% | 10.08% | +3.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.42% | 14.34% | +6.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.90% | 14.96% | +11.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.16% | 16.94% | +10.22% |
XRT vs. VHT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VHT's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRT vs. VHT - Dividend Comparison
XRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than VHT's 1.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | 1.71% | 1.61% | 1.53% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.45% | 1.22% |
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | 0.83% | 0.77% | 1.52% | 1.40% | 2.15% | 1.55% | 1.01% | 1.57% | 1.51% | 1.52% | 1.36% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRT and VHT have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XRT has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to VHT (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRT dropped -65.81% vs VHT's -39.12%.
On 10-year performance, VHT leads with 9.26% vs 8.56% for XRT. On fees, VHT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VHT has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VHT has performed better with a 9.26% return vs 8.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VHT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XRT.
VHT has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 0.83% for XRT.
XRT is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while VHT is Health & Biotech Equities. XRT tracks S&P Retail Select Industry, while VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XRT and 0.10% for VHT.
VHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XRT and VHT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer