PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRT vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRT vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRT achieves a 7.76% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 14.23% return. Over the past 10 years, XRT has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 9.00%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 20.46% annualized return.


XRT

1D
1.87%
1M
3.86%
6M
4.50%
YTD
7.76%
1Y
18.43%
3Y*
12.43%
5Y*
1.12%
10Y*
9.00%
ALL TIME*
9.68%

QQQ

1D
1.76%
1M
-1.76%
6M
12.07%
YTD
14.23%
1Y
27.00%
3Y*
24.17%
5Y*
14.45%
10Y*
20.46%
ALL TIME*
10.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$31.40B$28.17B$31.69B
$433.01M$377.95M$454.29M

XRT vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XRT
SPDR S&P Retail ETF
7.76%8.07%11.78%21.53%-31.64%42.60%41.91%14.12%-8.04%4.22%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
14.23%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between XRT and QQQ is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between XRT and QQQ has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XRT vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XRT
QQQ

Consumer Cyclical

75.2%
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

18.7%
6.3%

Technology

2.7%
60.9%

Communication Services

1.8%
13.1%

Healthcare

1.6%
3.6%

Energy

1.3%
0.5%

Basic Materials

-

1.0%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Industrials

-

2.7%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XRT
75.2%
QQQ
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

XRT
18.7%
QQQ
6.3%

Technology

XRT
2.7%
QQQ
60.9%

Communication Services

XRT
1.8%
QQQ
13.1%

Healthcare

XRT
1.6%
QQQ
3.6%

Energy

XRT
1.3%
QQQ
0.5%

Basic Materials

XRT

-

QQQ
1.0%

Financial Services

XRT

-

QQQ
0.2%

Industrials

XRT

-

QQQ
2.7%

Real Estate

XRT

-

QQQ
0.1%

Utilities

XRT

-

QQQ
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRT vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XRT
XRT Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
XRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRT Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
XRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRT Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XRT vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XRTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.25

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

2.27

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.09

7.21

-4.12

XRT vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRT Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRT and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XRT vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRT drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRT and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.81%

-82.97%

+17.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.53%

-11.96%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.62%

-22.77%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.57%

-35.12%

-9.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.02%

-35.12%

-11.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.26%

-6.07%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.95%

-32.61%

+17.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.97%

3.76%

+2.21%

Volatility

XRT vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) is 6.29%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 6.96%. This indicates that XRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.29%

6.96%

-0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.03%

16.12%

-1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.91%

19.37%

+1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.91%

22.92%

+3.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.20%

22.51%

+4.69%

XRT vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

XRT vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

XRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than QQQ's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.43%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
XRT
SPDR S&P Retail ETF
0.74%0.77%1.52%1.40%2.15%1.55%1.01%1.57%1.51%1.52%1.36%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRT and QQQ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to XRT (6.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRT dropped -65.81% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 20.46% vs 9.00% for XRT. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, XRT has been the lower-risk option at 6.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 20.46% return vs 9.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XRT.

XRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.43% for QQQ.

XRT is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. XRT tracks S&P Retail Select Industry Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XRT and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRT and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer