XRT vs. IYK
XRT (SPDR S&P Retail ETF) and IYK (iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XRT is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the S&P Retail Select Industry, while IYK is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XRT returned 9.22%/yr vs 9.22%/yr for IYK. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XRT charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IYK.
Performance
XRT vs. IYK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRT achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly lower than IYK's 7.31% return. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: XRT at 9.22% and IYK at 9.22%.
XRT
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 0.75%
- 6M
- -1.40%
- 1Y
- 12.23%
- 3Y*
- 12.77%
- 5Y*
- -0.81%
- 10Y*
- 9.22%
IYK
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- YTD
- 7.31%
- 6M
- 7.00%
- 1Y
- 4.22%
- 3Y*
- 5.03%
- 5Y*
- 6.13%
- 10Y*
- 9.22%
XRT vs. IYK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | 0.75% | 8.07% | 11.78% | 21.53% | -31.64% | 42.60% | 41.91% | 14.12% | -8.04% | 4.22% |
IYK iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF | 7.31% | 4.78% | 5.27% | -2.84% | 3.57% | 17.32% | 32.65% | 28.12% | -13.84% | 16.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRT and IYK is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XRT and IYK has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XRT vs. IYK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XRT
IYK
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
XRT
IYK
Consumer Defensive
XRT
IYK
Communication Services
XRT
IYK
-
Technology
XRT
IYK
-
Energy
XRT
IYK
-
Healthcare
XRT
IYK
Basic Materials
XRT
-
IYK
Financial Services
XRT
-
IYK
-
Industrials
XRT
-
IYK
Real Estate
XRT
-
IYK
-
Utilities
XRT
-
IYK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRT vs. IYK — Risk / Return Rank
XRT
IYK
XRT vs. IYK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF (IYK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XRT | IYK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.06 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 0.40 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.06 | 0.81 | +1.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRT vs. IYK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRT drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, which is greater than IYK's maximum drawdown of -42.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRT and IYK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRT | IYK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.81% | -42.64% | -23.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.53% | -10.68% | -2.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.62% | -12.14% | -13.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.57% | -15.05% | -29.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.02% | -33.19% | -13.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.42% | -7.50% | -3.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.99% | -5.07% | -9.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.96% | 5.20% | +0.76% |
Volatility
XRT vs. IYK - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF (IYK) at 5.09%. This indicates that XRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRT | IYK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 5.09% | +1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.33% | 9.91% | +4.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.64% | 12.69% | +7.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.93% | 13.07% | +13.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.20% | 15.55% | +11.65% |
XRT vs. IYK - Expense Ratio Comparison
XRT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IYK's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
XRT vs. IYK - Dividend Comparison
XRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than IYK's 2.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYK iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF | 2.67% | 2.75% | 2.63% | 2.74% | 2.16% | 1.49% | 1.42% | 2.21% | 2.81% | 1.74% | 2.63% | 2.11% |
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | 1.03% | 0.77% | 1.52% | 1.40% | 2.15% | 1.55% | 1.01% | 1.57% | 1.51% | 1.52% | 1.36% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XRT and IYK have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XRT has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to IYK (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRT dropped -65.81% vs IYK's -42.64%.
On 10-year performance, IYK leads with 9.22% vs 9.22% for XRT. On fees, XRT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IYK has been the lower-risk option at 5.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYK has performed better with a 9.22% return vs 9.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XRT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYK.
IYK has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 1.03% for XRT.
XRT is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while IYK is Consumer Staples Equities. XRT tracks S&P Retail Select Industry, while IYK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XRT and 0.42% for IYK.
XRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XRT and IYK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer