PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
XRSG.L vs. IUQF.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


XRSG.LIUQF.L
YTD Return18.11%24.33%
1Y Return38.05%29.17%
3Y Return (Ann)2.78%10.97%
5Y Return (Ann)9.91%15.22%
Sharpe Ratio1.902.44
Sortino Ratio2.863.54
Omega Ratio1.351.45
Calmar Ratio1.874.72
Martin Ratio9.2115.57
Ulcer Index4.06%1.85%
Daily Std Dev19.64%11.77%
Max Drawdown-35.31%-25.74%
Current Drawdown0.00%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between XRSG.L and IUQF.L is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

XRSG.L vs. IUQF.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, XRSG.L achieves a 18.11% return, which is significantly lower than IUQF.L's 24.33% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
18.09%
13.63%
XRSG.L
IUQF.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XRSG.L vs. IUQF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRSG.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IUQF.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


XRSG.L
Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C
Expense ratio chart for XRSG.L: current value at 0.30% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.30%
Expense ratio chart for IUQF.L: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XRSG.L vs. IUQF.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRSG.L) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUQF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XRSG.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XRSG.L, currently valued at 2.11, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.11
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XRSG.L, currently valued at 3.07, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.07
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XRSG.L, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.38
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XRSG.L, currently valued at 1.66, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.66
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XRSG.L, currently valued at 11.61, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0011.61
IUQF.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IUQF.L, currently valued at 2.92, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.92
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for IUQF.L, currently valued at 4.16, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.004.16
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for IUQF.L, currently valued at 1.54, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.54
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for IUQF.L, currently valued at 5.21, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.005.21
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for IUQF.L, currently valued at 17.54, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0017.54

XRSG.L vs. IUQF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRSG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the IUQF.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRSG.L and IUQF.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.11
2.92
XRSG.L
IUQF.L

Dividends

XRSG.L vs. IUQF.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XRSG.L nor IUQF.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XRSG.L vs. IUQF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRSG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.31%, which is greater than IUQF.L's maximum drawdown of -25.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRSG.L and IUQF.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember0
-0.10%
XRSG.L
IUQF.L

Volatility

XRSG.L vs. IUQF.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRSG.L) has a higher volatility of 6.48% compared to iShares Edge MSCI USA Quality Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IUQF.L) at 3.11%. This indicates that XRSG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUQF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.48%
3.11%
XRSG.L
IUQF.L