XQQ.TO vs. CDZ.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index ETF (CDZ.TO).
XQQ.TO and CDZ.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XQQ.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Market TR CAD. It was launched on May 3, 2011. CDZ.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Canada GR CAD. It was launched on Sep 8, 2006. Both XQQ.TO and CDZ.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XQQ.TO or CDZ.TO.
Key characteristics
| XQQ.TO | CDZ.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 15.61% | 15.60% |
| 1Y Return | 25.13% | 21.86% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.10% | 6.33% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 18.12% | 8.61% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 16.14% | 7.13% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.46 | 2.18 |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.90% | 10.89% |
| Max Drawdown | -100.00% | -49.12% |
| Current Drawdown | -99.99% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between XQQ.TO and CDZ.TO is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XQQ.TO vs. CDZ.TO - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XQQ.TO having a 15.61% return and CDZ.TO slightly lower at 15.60%. Over the past 10 years, XQQ.TO has outperformed CDZ.TO with an annualized return of 16.14%, while CDZ.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.13% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XQQ.TO vs. CDZ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XQQ.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than CDZ.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XQQ.TO vs. CDZ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index ETF (CDZ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XQQ.TO vs. CDZ.TO - Dividend Comparison
XQQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than CDZ.TO's 3.73% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XQQ.TO iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 0.32% | 0.31% | 0.43% | 0.17% | 0.26% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.53% | 0.76% | 0.62% | 1.30% | 1.10% |
CDZ.TO iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index ETF | 3.73% | 3.92% | 3.89% | 3.12% | 3.92% | 3.90% | 4.62% | 3.63% | 3.71% | 3.94% | 7.64% | 3.42% |
Drawdowns
XQQ.TO vs. CDZ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XQQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than CDZ.TO's maximum drawdown of -49.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XQQ.TO and CDZ.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XQQ.TO vs. CDZ.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.35% compared to iShares S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index ETF (CDZ.TO) at 3.25%. This indicates that XQQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDZ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.