XPP vs. XUS-U.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) and iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS-U.TO).
XPP and XUS-U.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XPP is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2009. XUS-U.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2019. Both XPP and XUS-U.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XPP or XUS-U.TO.
Correlation
The correlation between XPP and XUS-U.TO is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
XPP vs. XUS-U.TO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XPP:
1.79
XUS-U.TO:
1.92
XPP:
2.42
XUS-U.TO:
2.62
XPP:
1.32
XUS-U.TO:
1.36
XPP:
1.31
XUS-U.TO:
2.89
XPP:
5.04
XUS-U.TO:
12.09
XPP:
23.11%
XUS-U.TO:
1.94%
XPP:
64.97%
XUS-U.TO:
12.20%
XPP:
-89.90%
XUS-U.TO:
-33.55%
XPP:
-76.33%
XUS-U.TO:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XPP achieves a 30.40% return, which is significantly higher than XUS-U.TO's 3.92% return.
XPP
30.40%
31.69%
64.19%
100.58%
-16.53%
-9.61%
XUS-U.TO
3.92%
1.94%
10.59%
23.39%
14.08%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XPP vs. XUS-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XPP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XUS-U.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XPP vs. XUS-U.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
XPP
XUS-U.TO
XPP vs. XUS-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) and iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XPP vs. XUS-U.TO - Dividend Comparison
XPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than XUS-U.TO's 0.71% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPP ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 | 2.27% | 2.96% | 2.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.81% | 1.47% |
XUS-U.TO iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF | 0.71% | 0.74% | 0.90% | 1.04% | 0.71% | 0.91% | 0.04% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XPP vs. XUS-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPP drawdown since its inception was -89.90%, which is greater than XUS-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -33.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPP and XUS-U.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XPP vs. XUS-U.TO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) has a higher volatility of 13.61% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS-U.TO) at 2.88%. This indicates that XPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUS-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.