PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPL vs. VDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XPL vs. VDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Solitario Zinc Corp. (XPL) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPL achieves a 21.27% return, which is significantly higher than VDC's 5.11% return. Over the past 10 years, XPL has underperformed VDC with an annualized return of 5.82%, while VDC has yielded a comparatively higher 7.53% annualized return.


XPL

1D
1.44%
1M
1.81%
YTD
21.27%
6M
34.77%
1Y
29.20%
3Y*
12.72%
5Y*
3.54%
10Y*
5.82%

VDC

1D
-0.29%
1M
-4.65%
YTD
5.11%
6M
3.93%
1Y
0.46%
3Y*
7.21%
5Y*
5.99%
10Y*
7.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XPL vs. VDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XPL
Solitario Zinc Corp.
21.27%17.21%6.14%-9.68%24.04%-11.10%87.37%29.19%-61.45%-2.81%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
5.11%2.17%13.30%2.38%-1.79%17.64%10.86%26.11%-7.79%11.85%

Correlation

The correlation between XPL and VDC is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2006

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XPL vs. VDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPL
XPL Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
XPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPL Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

VDC
VDC Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
VDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDC Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
VDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDC Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPL vs. VDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Solitario Zinc Corp. (XPL) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XPLVDCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.52

0.04

+0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.14

0.14

+0.99

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.02

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

0.06

+0.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.29

0.12

+2.17

XPL vs. VDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPL Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is higher than the VDC Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPL and VDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XPLVDCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

0.04

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.46

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

0.52

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

0.66

-0.76

Drawdowns

XPL vs. VDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPL drawdown since its inception was -97.46%, which is greater than VDC's maximum drawdown of -34.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPL and VDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XPLVDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.46%

-34.24%

-63.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.41%

-9.28%

-25.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.29%

-11.78%

-30.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.13%

-16.55%

-34.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.21%

-25.31%

-57.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-85.94%

-9.07%

-76.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-75.90%

-3.73%

-72.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.00%

4.47%

+9.53%

Volatility

XPL vs. VDC - Volatility Comparison

Solitario Zinc Corp. (XPL) has a higher volatility of 10.21% compared to Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) at 4.06%. This indicates that XPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XPLVDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.21%

4.06%

+6.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.24%

9.74%

+25.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.89%

12.35%

+44.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.73%

13.13%

+41.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.95%

14.64%

+51.31%

Dividends

XPL vs. VDC - Dividend Comparison

XPL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
2.18%2.26%2.33%2.65%2.37%2.14%2.50%2.44%2.78%2.52%2.39%2.55%
XPL
Solitario Zinc Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XPL and VDC have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XPL has higher volatility (10.21%) compared to VDC (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPL dropped -97.46% vs VDC's -34.24%.

XPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.52 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XPL and VDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer