XPL vs. VDC
XPL (Solitario Zinc Corp.) is a stock, while VDC (Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF) is Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. Over the past 10 years, XPL returned 5.82%/yr vs 7.53%/yr for VDC. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XPL vs. VDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XPL achieves a 21.27% return, which is significantly higher than VDC's 5.11% return. Over the past 10 years, XPL has underperformed VDC with an annualized return of 5.82%, while VDC has yielded a comparatively higher 7.53% annualized return.
XPL
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 21.27%
- 6M
- 34.77%
- 1Y
- 29.20%
- 3Y*
- 12.72%
- 5Y*
- 3.54%
- 10Y*
- 5.82%
VDC
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -4.65%
- YTD
- 5.11%
- 6M
- 3.93%
- 1Y
- 0.46%
- 3Y*
- 7.21%
- 5Y*
- 5.99%
- 10Y*
- 7.53%
XPL vs. VDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPL Solitario Zinc Corp. | 21.27% | 17.21% | 6.14% | -9.68% | 24.04% | -11.10% | 87.37% | 29.19% | -61.45% | -2.81% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 5.11% | 2.17% | 13.30% | 2.38% | -1.79% | 17.64% | 10.86% | 26.11% | -7.79% | 11.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between XPL and VDC is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2006 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XPL vs. VDC — Risk / Return Rank
XPL
VDC
XPL vs. VDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Solitario Zinc Corp. (XPL) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XPL | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.52 | 0.04 | +0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.14 | 0.14 | +0.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.02 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 0.06 | +0.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.29 | 0.12 | +2.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XPL | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 | 0.04 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.46 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 | 0.52 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 0.66 | -0.76 |
Drawdowns
XPL vs. VDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPL drawdown since its inception was -97.46%, which is greater than VDC's maximum drawdown of -34.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPL and VDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XPL | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.46% | -34.24% | -63.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.41% | -9.28% | -25.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.29% | -11.78% | -30.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.13% | -16.55% | -34.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.21% | -25.31% | -57.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.94% | -9.07% | -76.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.90% | -3.73% | -72.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.00% | 4.47% | +9.53% |
Volatility
XPL vs. VDC - Volatility Comparison
Solitario Zinc Corp. (XPL) has a higher volatility of 10.21% compared to Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) at 4.06%. This indicates that XPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XPL | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.21% | 4.06% | +6.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.24% | 9.74% | +25.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.89% | 12.35% | +44.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.73% | 13.13% | +41.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.95% | 14.64% | +51.31% |
Dividends
XPL vs. VDC - Dividend Comparison
XPL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 2.18% | 2.26% | 2.33% | 2.65% | 2.37% | 2.14% | 2.50% | 2.44% | 2.78% | 2.52% | 2.39% | 2.55% |
XPL Solitario Zinc Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XPL and VDC have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XPL has higher volatility (10.21%) compared to VDC (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPL dropped -97.46% vs VDC's -34.24%.
XPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.52 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XPL and VDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer