XPH vs. NVS
XPH (SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF) is Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the S&P Pharmaceuticals Select Industry Index, while NVS (Novartis AG) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XPH returned 3.44%/yr vs 9.84%/yr for NVS. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XPH vs. NVS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XPH achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than NVS's 7.37% return. Over the past 10 years, XPH has underperformed NVS with an annualized return of 3.44%, while NVS has yielded a comparatively higher 9.84% annualized return.
XPH
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -4.74%
- YTD
- 0.66%
- 6M
- 4.44%
- 1Y
- 37.98%
- 3Y*
- 13.07%
- 5Y*
- 3.50%
- 10Y*
- 3.44%
NVS
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- YTD
- 7.37%
- 6M
- 10.70%
- 1Y
- 27.68%
- 3Y*
- 17.23%
- 5Y*
- 14.04%
- 10Y*
- 9.84%
XPH vs. NVS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XPH SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF | 0.66% | 31.60% | 4.94% | 2.97% | -9.83% | -10.54% | 14.68% | 25.61% | -15.32% | 12.05% |
NVS Novartis AG | 7.37% | 46.95% | 0.02% | 16.14% | 8.06% | -3.65% | 3.34% | 13.92% | 5.95% | 19.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between XPH and NVS is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2006 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XPH vs. NVS — Risk / Return Rank
XPH
NVS
XPH vs. NVS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH) and Novartis AG (NVS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XPH | NVS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.77 | 1.37 | +0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.51 | 1.94 | +0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.24 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 2.20 | +0.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.37 | 5.52 | +5.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XPH | NVS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77 | 1.37 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.75 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | 0.50 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.42 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
XPH vs. NVS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XPH drawdown since its inception was -48.03%, which is greater than NVS's maximum drawdown of -42.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPH and NVS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XPH | NVS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.03% | -42.10% | -5.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.97% | -12.65% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.57% | -19.95% | -3.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.63% | -20.42% | -11.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.97% | -26.03% | -9.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.22% | -12.21% | +4.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.25% | -10.93% | -6.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 5.03% | -1.68% |
Volatility
XPH vs. NVS - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH) has a higher volatility of 7.03% compared to Novartis AG (NVS) at 5.62%. This indicates that XPH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XPH | NVS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.03% | 5.62% | +1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.77% | 14.25% | +2.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.52% | 20.28% | +1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 18.78% | +2.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.10% | 19.59% | +2.51% |
Dividends
XPH vs. NVS - Dividend Comparison
XPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than NVS's 3.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVS Novartis AG | 3.32% | 2.90% | 3.84% | 3.44% | 3.70% | 3.86% | 3.22% | 3.03% | 3.47% | 3.24% | 3.73% | 3.10% |
XPH SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF | 0.66% | 0.83% | 1.58% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 0.95% | 0.47% | 0.64% | 0.65% | 0.67% | 0.63% | 7.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XPH and NVS have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XPH has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to NVS (5.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPH dropped -48.03% vs NVS's -42.10%.
XPH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XPH and NVS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer