PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XPH vs. NVS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XPH vs. NVS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH) and Novartis AG (NVS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XPH achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than NVS's 7.37% return. Over the past 10 years, XPH has underperformed NVS with an annualized return of 3.44%, while NVS has yielded a comparatively higher 9.84% annualized return.


XPH

1D
1.10%
1M
-4.74%
YTD
0.66%
6M
4.44%
1Y
37.98%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
3.44%

NVS

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
7.37%
6M
10.70%
1Y
27.68%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
14.04%
10Y*
9.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XPH vs. NVS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XPH
SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF
0.66%31.60%4.94%2.97%-9.83%-10.54%14.68%25.61%-15.32%12.05%
NVS
Novartis AG
7.37%46.95%0.02%16.14%8.06%-3.65%3.34%13.92%5.95%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between XPH and NVS is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2006

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XPH vs. NVS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XPH
XPH Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
XPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPH Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
XPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPH Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

NVS
NVS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVS Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVS Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XPH vs. NVS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH) and Novartis AG (NVS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XPHNVSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.77

1.37

+0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.51

1.94

+0.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.24

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

2.20

+0.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.37

5.52

+5.86

XPH vs. NVS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XPH Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the NVS Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XPH and NVS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XPHNVSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

1.37

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.75

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.50

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.42

-0.03

Drawdowns

XPH vs. NVS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XPH drawdown since its inception was -48.03%, which is greater than NVS's maximum drawdown of -42.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XPH and NVS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XPHNVSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.03%

-42.10%

-5.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.97%

-12.65%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.57%

-19.95%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.63%

-20.42%

-11.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.97%

-26.03%

-9.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.22%

-12.21%

+4.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.25%

-10.93%

-6.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

5.03%

-1.68%

Volatility

XPH vs. NVS - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF (XPH) has a higher volatility of 7.03% compared to Novartis AG (NVS) at 5.62%. This indicates that XPH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XPHNVSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.03%

5.62%

+1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.77%

14.25%

+2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.52%

20.28%

+1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.84%

18.78%

+2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.10%

19.59%

+2.51%

Dividends

XPH vs. NVS - Dividend Comparison

XPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than NVS's 3.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVS
Novartis AG
3.32%2.90%3.84%3.44%3.70%3.86%3.22%3.03%3.47%3.24%3.73%3.10%
XPH
SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF
0.66%0.83%1.58%1.28%1.64%0.95%0.47%0.64%0.65%0.67%0.63%7.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


XPH and NVS have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XPH has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to NVS (5.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XPH dropped -48.03% vs NVS's -42.10%.

XPH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XPH and NVS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer