PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOP vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOP vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOP achieves a 32.00% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's 22.94% return. Over the past 10 years, XOP has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 3.69%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 24.67% annualized return.


XOP

1D
4.17%
1M
0.40%
6M
30.68%
YTD
32.00%
1Y
27.02%
3Y*
11.17%
5Y*
16.31%
10Y*
3.69%

VGT

1D
-2.12%
1M
-0.88%
6M
21.06%
YTD
22.94%
1Y
38.55%
3Y*
28.00%
5Y*
18.46%
10Y*
24.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOP vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XOP
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
32.00%-2.15%-1.00%3.56%45.37%66.74%-36.40%-9.44%-28.10%-9.47%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
22.94%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between XOP and VGT is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006

0.42

The correlation between XOP and VGT shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XOP vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XOP
VGT

Energy

96.8%
0.3%

Basic Materials

3.2%
0.0%

Industrials

2.2%
0.3%

Communication Services

-

0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.5%

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

98.5%

Utilities

-

-

Energy

XOP
96.8%
VGT
0.3%

Basic Materials

XOP
3.2%
VGT
0.0%

Industrials

XOP
2.2%
VGT
0.3%

Communication Services

XOP

-

VGT
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XOP

-

VGT
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

XOP

-

VGT

-

Financial Services

XOP

-

VGT
0.5%

Healthcare

XOP

-

VGT
0.0%

Real Estate

XOP

-

VGT

-

Technology

XOP

-

VGT
98.5%

Utilities

XOP

-

VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOP vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOP
XOP Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
XOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOP Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
XOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOP Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOP vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XOPVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.28

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

2.36

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.61

6.86

-3.25

XOP vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOP Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOP and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XOP vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOP drawdown since its inception was -90.27%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOP and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOPVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.27%

-54.63%

-35.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.50%

-16.40%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.98%

-27.23%

-7.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.98%

-35.07%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.61%

-35.07%

-47.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.30%

-7.99%

-30.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.57%

-7.94%

-34.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.58%

5.63%

+1.95%

Volatility

XOP vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) is 8.61%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 9.66%. This indicates that XOP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOPVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.61%

9.66%

-1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.15%

19.38%

+2.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.35%

23.37%

+4.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.79%

25.69%

+8.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.17%

24.80%

+15.37%

XOP vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOP has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

XOP vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

XOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than VGT's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.37%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%
XOP
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
1.97%2.62%2.45%2.63%2.47%1.61%2.34%1.47%0.99%0.76%0.76%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOP and VGT have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (9.66%) compared to XOP (8.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOP dropped -90.27% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 24.67% vs 3.69% for XOP. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, XOP has been the lower-risk option at 8.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 24.67% return vs 3.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XOP.

XOP has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.37% for VGT.

XOP is categorized as Energy Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. XOP tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XOP and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOP and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer