PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOMO vs. NVDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XOMO vs. NVDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XOMO vs. NVDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
23.45%6.90%6.11%-8.62%
NVDY
YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
-0.93%27.38%114.23%2.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOMO achieves a 23.45% return, which is significantly higher than NVDY's -0.93% return.


XOMO

1D
-4.29%
1M
2.32%
YTD
23.45%
6M
31.32%
1Y
22.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDY

1D
0.69%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
-0.93%
6M
0.94%
1Y
53.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XOMO vs. NVDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOMO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XOMO vs. NVDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOMO
XOMO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDY
NVDY Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
NVDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDY Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDY Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOMO vs. NVDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XOMONVDYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

1.65

-0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.40

2.20

-0.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.30

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

4.01

-2.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.35

10.43

-7.07

XOMO vs. NVDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the NVDY Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOMO and NVDY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XOMONVDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

1.65

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

1.54

-1.00

Correlation

The correlation between XOMO and NVDY is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

XOMO vs. NVDY - Dividend Comparison

XOMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.57%, less than NVDY's 72.29% yield.


TTM202520242023
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
30.57%31.64%26.94%5.13%
NVDY
YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
72.29%83.10%83.65%22.32%

Drawdowns

XOMO vs. NVDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOMO drawdown since its inception was -18.90%, smaller than the maximum NVDY drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOMO and NVDY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XOMONVDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.90%

-34.08%

+15.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.24%

-13.77%

-1.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.12%

-7.25%

+2.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.05%

-6.31%

-0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.69%

5.30%

+1.39%

Volatility

XOMO vs. NVDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) is 6.57%, while YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY) has a volatility of 9.09%. This indicates that XOMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XOMONVDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.57%

9.09%

-2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.81%

21.62%

-7.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.02%

32.44%

-10.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.46%

38.75%

-20.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.46%

38.75%

-20.29%