PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOMO vs. NVDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOMO vs. NVDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOMO achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly higher than NVDY's 7.04% return.


XOMO

1D
0.93%
1M
-6.78%
YTD
10.22%
6M
11.32%
1Y
16.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDY

1D
-3.24%
1M
-5.21%
YTD
7.04%
6M
6.21%
1Y
33.90%
3Y*
50.59%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOMO vs. NVDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
10.22%6.90%6.11%-8.59%
NVDY
YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
7.04%27.38%114.23%2.58%

Correlation

The correlation between XOMO and NVDY is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2023

-0.05

The correlation between XOMO and NVDY shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOMO vs. NVDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOMO
XOMO Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
XOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
XOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDY
NVDY Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
NVDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDY Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDY Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOMO vs. NVDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XOMONVDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.21

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

2.66

-1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.99

6.05

-3.05

XOMO vs. NVDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOMO Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the NVDY Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOMO and NVDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XOMO vs. NVDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOMO drawdown since its inception was -18.90%, smaller than the maximum NVDY drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOMO and NVDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOMONVDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.90%

-34.08%

+15.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.86%

-12.81%

-4.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.29%

-11.62%

-3.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.31%

-6.20%

-1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.66%

5.62%

+0.04%

Volatility

XOMO vs. NVDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) is 7.49%, while YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY) has a volatility of 10.10%. This indicates that XOMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOMONVDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.49%

10.10%

-2.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.38%

21.63%

-4.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.65%

28.32%

-7.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.13%

38.19%

-19.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.13%

38.19%

-19.06%

XOMO vs. NVDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOMO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

XOMO vs. NVDY - Dividend Comparison

XOMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.38%, less than NVDY's 64.30% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
NVDY
YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
64.30%83.10%83.65%22.32%
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
37.38%31.64%26.94%5.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOMO and NVDY have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDY has higher volatility (10.10%) compared to XOMO (7.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOMO dropped -18.90% vs NVDY's -34.08%.

On 1-year performance, NVDY leads with 33.90% vs 16.88% for XOMO. On fees, NVDY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, XOMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVDY has performed better with a 33.90% return vs 16.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVDY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.

NVDY has the higher dividend yield at 64.30%, compared with 37.38% for XOMO.

Their fees differ too: 1.01% for XOMO and 0.99% for NVDY.

NVDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOMO and NVDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer