XNTK vs. SCHD
XNTK (SPDR NYSE Technology ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XNTK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NYSE Technology Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XNTK returned 25.57%/yr vs 12.79%/yr for SCHD. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XNTK charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
XNTK vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNTK achieves a 37.92% return, which is significantly higher than SCHD's 19.82% return. Over the past 10 years, XNTK has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 25.57%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.79% annualized return.
XNTK
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 18.67%
- YTD
- 37.92%
- 6M
- 36.17%
- 1Y
- 73.92%
- 3Y*
- 42.75%
- 5Y*
- 21.11%
- 10Y*
- 25.57%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 19.82%
- 6M
- 19.65%
- 1Y
- 28.76%
- 3Y*
- 15.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.50%
- 10Y*
- 12.79%
XNTK vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNTK SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | 37.92% | 38.06% | 23.49% | 70.13% | -41.07% | 17.63% | 73.91% | 38.08% | -7.13% | 40.37% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.82% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNTK and SCHD is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XNTK and SCHD has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XNTK vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XNTK
SCHD
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XNTK
SCHD
Communication Services
XNTK
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
XNTK
SCHD
Basic Materials
XNTK
-
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
XNTK
-
SCHD
Energy
XNTK
-
SCHD
Financial Services
XNTK
-
SCHD
Healthcare
XNTK
-
SCHD
Industrials
XNTK
-
SCHD
Real Estate
XNTK
-
SCHD
-
Utilities
XNTK
-
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNTK vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
XNTK
SCHD
XNTK vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XNTK | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.47 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.37 | 6.26 | -1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.56 | 15.38 | -0.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XNTK | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.19 | 2.64 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.59 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 | 0.77 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.86 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
XNTK vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNTK drawdown since its inception was -72.38%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNTK and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNTK | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.38% | -33.37% | -39.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.00% | -4.61% | -12.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.11% | -16.13% | -11.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.28% | -16.85% | -31.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.28% | -33.37% | -14.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | -0.73% | -0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.30% | -3.32% | -17.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.09% | 1.87% | +3.22% |
Volatility
XNTK vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) has a higher volatility of 7.65% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.69%. This indicates that XNTK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNTK | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.65% | 2.69% | +4.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.06% | 7.65% | +10.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.31% | 10.95% | +12.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.90% | 14.38% | +13.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.63% | 16.71% | +9.92% |
XNTK vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNTK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
XNTK vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
XNTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than SCHD's 3.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.24% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
XNTK SPDR NYSE Technology ETF | 0.17% | 0.23% | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.85% | 0.34% | 0.30% | 0.61% | 29.64% | 1.29% | 0.81% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XNTK and SCHD have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XNTK has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to SCHD (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNTK dropped -72.38% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, XNTK leads with 25.57% vs 12.79% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 25.57% return vs 12.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XNTK.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 0.17% for XNTK.
XNTK is categorized as Technology Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. XNTK tracks NYSE Technology Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XNTK and 0.06% for SCHD.
XNTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XNTK and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer