XNAS.DE vs. QGRW
XNAS.DE (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) and QGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XNAS.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®, while QGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XNAS.DE returned 24.64%/yr vs 25.53%/yr for QGRW. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XNAS.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QGRW.
Performance
XNAS.DE vs. QGRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XNAS.DE is traded in EUR, while QGRW is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QGRW values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNAS.DE achieves a 20.53% return, which is significantly higher than QGRW's 16.74% return.
XNAS.DE
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 7.97%
- YTD
- 20.53%
- 6M
- 18.71%
- 1Y
- 37.14%
- 3Y*
- 24.64%
- 5Y*
- 18.79%
- 10Y*
- —
QGRW
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 6.91%
- YTD
- 16.74%
- 6M
- 14.16%
- 1Y
- 33.89%
- 3Y*
- 25.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XNAS.DE vs. QGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 20.53% | 7.11% | 33.75% | 51.36% | -5.02% |
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund | 12.48% | 5.06% | 43.75% | 51.37% | -4.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNAS.DE and QGRW is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2022 | 0.65 |
The correlation between XNAS.DE and QGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNAS.DE vs. QGRW — Risk / Return Rank
XNAS.DE
QGRW
XNAS.DE vs. QGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XNAS.DE | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.34 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.77 | 2.31 | +1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.16 | 7.57 | +3.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XNAS.DE | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 1.95 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 1.44 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
XNAS.DE vs. QGRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNAS.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.25%, which is greater than QGRW's maximum drawdown of -28.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAS.DE and QGRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNAS.DE | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.25% | -28.68% | -2.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.00% | -14.75% | +4.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.72% | -28.68% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -1.15% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.83% | -4.18% | -3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 4.49% | -1.11% |
Volatility
XNAS.DE vs. QGRW - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) at 3.88%. This indicates that XNAS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNAS.DE | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 3.88% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.91% | 12.99% | -2.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.71% | 17.50% | -1.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.88% | 21.72% | -1.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 21.72% | -1.88% |
XNAS.DE vs. QGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNAS.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
XNAS.DE vs. QGRW - Dividend Comparison
XNAS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.14% | 0.11% |
XNAS.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XNAS.DE and QGRW have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNAS.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNAS.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QGRW.
XNAS.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while QGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. XNAS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while QGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XNAS.DE and 0.28% for QGRW.
Find the right allocation for XNAS.DE and QGRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer