PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
XMU.TO vs. DLN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


XMU.TODLN
YTD Return27.03%23.57%
1Y Return28.51%33.73%
3Y Return (Ann)10.25%10.75%
5Y Return (Ann)9.81%12.28%
10Y Return (Ann)12.94%11.04%
Sharpe Ratio3.543.48
Sortino Ratio5.694.83
Omega Ratio1.741.66
Calmar Ratio8.946.31
Martin Ratio27.0623.71
Ulcer Index1.05%1.41%
Daily Std Dev8.02%9.62%
Max Drawdown-27.31%-57.84%
Current Drawdown-0.11%-0.67%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between XMU.TO and DLN is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

XMU.TO vs. DLN - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, XMU.TO achieves a 27.03% return, which is significantly higher than DLN's 23.57% return. Over the past 10 years, XMU.TO has outperformed DLN with an annualized return of 12.94%, while DLN has yielded a comparatively lower 11.04% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
13.28%
13.82%
XMU.TO
DLN

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XMU.TO vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMU.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.


XMU.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF
Expense ratio chart for XMU.TO: current value at 0.33% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.33%
Expense ratio chart for DLN: current value at 0.28% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.28%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XMU.TO vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (XMU.TO) and WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMU.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XMU.TO, currently valued at 3.21, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.003.22
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XMU.TO, currently valued at 4.82, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.82
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XMU.TO, currently valued at 1.62, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.62
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XMU.TO, currently valued at 3.43, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.43
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XMU.TO, currently valued at 20.27, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0020.27
DLN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for DLN, currently valued at 3.25, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.003.25
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for DLN, currently valued at 4.50, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.50
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for DLN, currently valued at 1.62, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.62
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for DLN, currently valued at 6.33, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.006.33
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for DLN, currently valued at 21.75, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0021.75

XMU.TO vs. DLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.54, which is comparable to the DLN Sharpe Ratio of 3.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMU.TO and DLN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.504.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.22
3.25
XMU.TO
DLN

Dividends

XMU.TO vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison

XMU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than DLN's 1.99% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
XMU.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF
1.13%1.41%1.17%1.06%1.68%1.44%1.48%1.59%1.83%1.43%4.96%1.30%
DLN
WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF
1.99%2.43%2.53%2.02%2.66%2.51%2.90%2.33%2.64%3.01%2.34%2.40%

Drawdowns

XMU.TO vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMU.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.31%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMU.TO and DLN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.28%
-0.67%
XMU.TO
DLN

Volatility

XMU.TO vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (XMU.TO) and WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) have volatilities of 3.25% and 3.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.25%
3.14%
XMU.TO
DLN