PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMMO vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMMO vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 22.90% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 41.43% return. Over the past 10 years, XMMO has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 20.13%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.48% annualized return.


XMMO

1D
-2.42%
1M
3.07%
YTD
22.90%
6M
20.25%
1Y
35.75%
3Y*
31.04%
5Y*
15.91%
10Y*
20.13%

TQQQ

1D
-9.86%
1M
-4.37%
YTD
41.43%
6M
35.75%
1Y
100.69%
3Y*
58.02%
5Y*
21.47%
10Y*
45.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMMO vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
22.90%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
41.43%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between XMMO and TQQQ is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010

0.75

The correlation between XMMO and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

XMMO vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XMMO
TQQQ

Industrials

41.5%
2.8%

Technology

19.2%
53.8%

Basic Materials

6.9%
1.1%

Energy

6.5%
0.6%

Healthcare

6.3%
4.2%

Utilities

5.6%
1.4%

Real Estate

5.4%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
7.7%

Financial Services

2.5%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

2.2%
12.3%

Communication Services

1.3%
15.8%

Industrials

XMMO
41.5%
TQQQ
2.8%

Technology

XMMO
19.2%
TQQQ
53.8%

Basic Materials

XMMO
6.9%
TQQQ
1.1%

Energy

XMMO
6.5%
TQQQ
0.6%

Healthcare

XMMO
6.3%
TQQQ
4.2%

Utilities

XMMO
5.6%
TQQQ
1.4%

Real Estate

XMMO
5.4%
TQQQ
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

XMMO
2.7%
TQQQ
7.7%

Financial Services

XMMO
2.5%
TQQQ
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XMMO
2.2%
TQQQ
12.3%

Communication Services

XMMO
1.3%
TQQQ
15.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMMO vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMMO vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XMMOTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.30

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.31

2.74

+1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.07

8.72

+8.35

XMMO vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMMO and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XMMO vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMMOTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.37%

-81.66%

+26.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-36.97%

+28.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.93%

-58.04%

+33.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

-81.66%

+53.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

-81.66%

+44.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.42%

-14.65%

+12.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.43%

-18.49%

+9.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

11.59%

-9.49%

Volatility

XMMO vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) is 8.50%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 27.27%. This indicates that XMMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMMOTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.50%

27.27%

-18.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.79%

43.35%

-26.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.94%

53.39%

-33.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.65%

67.41%

-45.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.33%

66.32%

-43.99%

XMMO vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMMO vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, more than TQQQ's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.42%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.57%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMMO and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (27.27%) compared to XMMO (8.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 45.48% vs 20.13% for XMMO. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XMMO has been the lower-risk option at 8.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 45.48% return vs 20.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

XMMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.42% for TQQQ.

XMMO is categorized as Momentum, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMMO and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer