PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SMDV vs. XMLV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


SMDVXMLV
YTD Return15.54%22.29%
1Y Return36.65%33.61%
3Y Return (Ann)5.91%6.62%
5Y Return (Ann)6.68%6.14%
Sharpe Ratio1.672.64
Sortino Ratio2.553.86
Omega Ratio1.311.48
Calmar Ratio2.282.50
Martin Ratio7.2319.01
Ulcer Index4.89%1.71%
Daily Std Dev21.23%12.30%
Max Drawdown-34.12%-39.86%
Current Drawdown-1.10%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between SMDV and XMLV is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

SMDV vs. XMLV - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, SMDV achieves a 15.54% return, which is significantly lower than XMLV's 22.29% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.62%
14.03%
SMDV
XMLV

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SMDV vs. XMLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMDV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XMLV's 0.25% expense ratio.


SMDV
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF
Expense ratio chart for SMDV: current value at 0.40% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.40%
Expense ratio chart for XMLV: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SMDV vs. XMLV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) and Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMDV
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SMDV, currently valued at 1.67, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.67
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SMDV, currently valued at 2.55, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.55
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SMDV, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.31
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SMDV, currently valued at 2.28, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.28
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SMDV, currently valued at 7.23, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.007.23
XMLV
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XMLV, currently valued at 2.64, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.64
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XMLV, currently valued at 3.86, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.86
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XMLV, currently valued at 1.48, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.48
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XMLV, currently valued at 2.50, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.50
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XMLV, currently valued at 19.01, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0019.01

SMDV vs. XMLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMDV Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is lower than the XMLV Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMDV and XMLV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.67
2.64
SMDV
XMLV

Dividends

SMDV vs. XMLV - Dividend Comparison

SMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than XMLV's 1.87% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
SMDV
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF
2.60%2.69%2.51%2.03%2.12%2.03%1.97%1.84%1.08%1.47%0.00%0.00%
XMLV
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF
1.87%2.34%2.05%1.14%1.93%2.02%2.12%1.74%1.72%1.85%2.00%1.62%

Drawdowns

SMDV vs. XMLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMDV drawdown since its inception was -34.12%, smaller than the maximum XMLV drawdown of -39.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMDV and XMLV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.10%
0
SMDV
XMLV

Volatility

SMDV vs. XMLV - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) has a higher volatility of 8.54% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV) at 4.24%. This indicates that SMDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.54%
4.24%
SMDV
XMLV