XMLV vs. SCHD
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD).
XMLV and SCHD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XMLV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Low Volatility Index. It was launched on Feb 15, 2013. SCHD is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. It was launched on Oct 20, 2011. Both XMLV and SCHD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XMLV or SCHD.
Key characteristics
| XMLV | SCHD | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 22.29% | 17.75% |
| 1Y Return | 33.61% | 31.70% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.62% | 7.26% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 6.14% | 12.80% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 9.25% | 11.72% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.64 | 2.67 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.86 | 3.84 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.48 | 1.47 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.50 | 2.80 |
| Martin Ratio | 19.01 | 14.83 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.71% | 2.04% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.30% | 11.32% |
| Max Drawdown | -39.86% | -33.37% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMLV and SCHD is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XMLV vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XMLV achieves a 22.29% return, which is significantly higher than SCHD's 17.75% return. Over the past 10 years, XMLV has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 9.25%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.72% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XMLV vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XMLV vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XMLV vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
XMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than SCHD's 3.36% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMLV Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF | 1.87% | 2.34% | 2.05% | 1.14% | 1.93% | 2.02% | 2.12% | 1.74% | 1.72% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 1.62% |
SCHD Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF | 3.36% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% | 2.63% | 2.47% |
Drawdowns
XMLV vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMLV drawdown since its inception was -39.86%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMLV and SCHD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XMLV vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.57%. This indicates that XMLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.