XMHQ vs. JHMM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XMHQ (Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF) and JHMM (John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMHQ is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Index, while JHMM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMHQ returned 12.83%/yr vs 11.88%/yr for JHMM. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XMHQ charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for JHMM.

Performance

XMHQ vs. JHMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) and John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMHQ achieves a 9.49% return, which is significantly lower than JHMM's 12.60% return. Over the past 10 years, XMHQ has outperformed JHMM with an annualized return of 12.83%, while JHMM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.88% annualized return.

XMHQ

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 4.20%
• YTD: 9.49%
• 6M: 9.51%
• 1Y: 14.33%
• 3Y*: 16.56%
• 5Y*: 9.37%
• 10Y*: 12.83%

JHMM

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 3.21%
• YTD: 12.60%
• 6M: 13.14%
• 1Y: 24.83%
• 3Y*: 17.01%
• 5Y*: 8.39%
• 10Y*: 11.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMHQ vs. JHMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF	9.49%	4.71%	16.79%	29.51%	-12.42%	20.98%	26.61%	27.18%	-9.08%	15.64%
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF	12.60%	10.73%	14.61%	14.53%	-15.30%	24.54%	16.22%	30.01%	-9.57%	19.96%

Correlation

The correlation between XMHQ and JHMM is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2015	0.88

The correlation between XMHQ and JHMM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

XMHQ vs. JHMM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XMHQ	JHMM
Industrials	25.8%	19.4%
Healthcare	19.7%	10.2%
Financial Services	15.1%	15.3%
Technology	12.1%	17.2%
Consumer Cyclical	9.7%	11.0%
Energy	6.7%	5.4%
Basic Materials	4.8%	4.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	3.7%
Communication Services	2.7%	2.7%
Utilities	2.2%	5.4%
Real Estate	-	5.4%

Return for Risk

XMHQ vs. JHMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMHQ

XMHQ Risk / Return Rank: 28
XMHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
XMHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
XMHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 24
XMHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
XMHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 31

JHMM

JHMM Risk / Return Rank: 55
JHMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
JHMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
JHMM Omega Ratio Rank: 49
JHMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
JHMM Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMHQ vs. JHMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) and John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XMHQ	JHMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	1.77	-0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	2.55	-1.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.31	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	2.89	-1.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.76	11.17	-6.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XMHQ vs. JHMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMHQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the JHMM Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMHQ and JHMM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XMHQ	JHMM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93	1.77	-0.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.46	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	0.61	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.63	-0.18

Drawdowns

XMHQ vs. JHMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMHQ drawdown since its inception was -58.19%, which is greater than JHMM's maximum drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMHQ and JHMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMHQ	JHMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.19%	-40.71%	-17.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.85%	-8.64%	-0.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.56%	-21.88%	-2.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.47%	-24.10%	-1.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.90%	-40.71%	+3.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.24%	+0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.29%	-5.43%	-3.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.02%	2.23%	+0.79%

Volatility

XMHQ vs. JHMM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) has a higher volatility of 4.67% compared to John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) at 3.81%. This indicates that XMHQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMHQ	JHMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.67%	3.81%	+0.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.09%	10.47%	+0.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.47%	14.12%	+1.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.74%	18.32%	+2.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.71%	19.60%	+1.11%

XMHQ vs. JHMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMHQ has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than JHMM's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMHQ vs. JHMM - Dividend Comparison

XMHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than JHMM's 0.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF	0.87%	0.98%	1.01%	1.17%	1.16%	0.72%	1.04%	1.02%	1.36%	0.90%	1.15%	0.33%
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF	0.55%	0.64%	5.20%	0.73%	1.72%	1.00%	1.12%	1.22%	1.59%	1.06%	1.63%	1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMHQ and JHMM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, XMHQ and JHMM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, XMHQ or JHMM?

XMHQ has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to JHMM (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMHQ dropped -58.19% vs JHMM's -40.71%.

Which ETF is better, XMHQ or JHMM?

On 10-year performance, XMHQ leads with 12.83% vs 11.88% for JHMM. On fees, XMHQ is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, JHMM has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XMHQ or JHMM?

Over the 10-year period, XMHQ has performed better with a 12.83% return vs 11.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMHQ or JHMM?

XMHQ is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for JHMM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XMHQ or JHMM?

JHMM has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.55% for XMHQ.

What is the main difference between XMHQ and JHMM?

XMHQ is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while JHMM is Mid Cap Growth Equities. XMHQ tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while JHMM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Manulife. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XMHQ and 0.42% for JHMM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JHMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.