XMH.TO vs. CCO.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMH.TO) and Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO).
XMH.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400® CAD Hedged Index. It was launched on Aug 4, 2015.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XMH.TO or CCO.TO.
Correlation
The correlation between XMH.TO and CCO.TO is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XMH.TO vs. CCO.TO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XMH.TO:
0.91
CCO.TO:
0.38
XMH.TO:
1.37
CCO.TO:
0.80
XMH.TO:
1.17
CCO.TO:
1.11
XMH.TO:
1.58
CCO.TO:
0.50
XMH.TO:
3.72
CCO.TO:
1.24
XMH.TO:
3.81%
CCO.TO:
13.69%
XMH.TO:
15.58%
CCO.TO:
45.04%
XMH.TO:
-44.82%
CCO.TO:
-83.92%
XMH.TO:
-6.11%
CCO.TO:
-22.57%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMH.TO achieves a 2.55% return, which is significantly higher than CCO.TO's -9.51% return.
XMH.TO
2.55%
-0.14%
5.99%
12.22%
8.17%
N/A
CCO.TO
-9.51%
-6.05%
21.56%
17.49%
40.99%
13.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XMH.TO vs. CCO.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
XMH.TO
CCO.TO
XMH.TO vs. CCO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMH.TO) and Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XMH.TO vs. CCO.TO - Dividend Comparison
XMH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than CCO.TO's 0.16% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMH.TO iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 1.00% | 1.03% | 1.16% | 1.30% | 0.91% | 1.02% | 1.35% | 1.39% | 0.88% | 1.52% | 0.63% | 0.00% |
CCO.TO Cameco Corporation | 0.16% | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.22% | 0.35% | 1.21% | 0.39% | 2.76% | 2.28% | 1.82% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
XMH.TO vs. CCO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMH.TO drawdown since its inception was -44.82%, smaller than the maximum CCO.TO drawdown of -83.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMH.TO and CCO.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XMH.TO vs. CCO.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMH.TO) is 4.17%, while Cameco Corporation (CCO.TO) has a volatility of 20.88%. This indicates that XMH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.