XME vs. AMR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XME (SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF) is Materials fund tracking the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while AMR (Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, XME returned 23.61%/yr vs 60.15%/yr for AMR. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

XME vs. AMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XME achieves a 24.24% return, which is significantly higher than AMR's 7.67% return.

XME

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 8.22%
• YTD: 24.24%
• 6M: 27.86%
• 1Y: 101.48%
• 3Y*: 40.70%
• 5Y*: 23.61%
• 10Y*: 19.99%

AMR

• 1D: 1.14%
• 1M: 14.16%
• YTD: 7.67%
• 6M: 16.64%
• 1Y: 93.66%
• 3Y*: 14.91%
• 5Y*: 60.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XME vs. AMR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF	24.24%	83.47%	-4.54%	21.51%	13.13%	34.92%	15.95%	14.69%	-26.78%	24.20%
AMR Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.	7.67%	-0.12%	-40.95%	133.87%	150.06%	436.94%	25.64%	-86.23%	10.71%	-4.69%

Correlation

The correlation between XME and AMR is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2017	0.48

The correlation between XME and AMR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XME vs. AMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XME

XME Risk / Return Rank: 78
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 75
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 64

AMR

AMR Risk / Return Rank: 79
AMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
AMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
AMR Omega Ratio Rank: 75
AMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
AMR Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XME vs. AMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XME	AMR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.95	1.55	+1.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.38	2.31	+1.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.26	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.51	2.70	+1.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.48	6.06	+5.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XME vs. AMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XME Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is higher than the AMR Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XME and AMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XME	AMR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.95	1.55	+1.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	1.01	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.21	-0.03

Drawdowns

XME vs. AMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XME drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, smaller than the maximum AMR drawdown of -97.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XME and AMR.

Drawdown Indicators

	XME	AMR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.89%	-97.35%	+11.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.60%	-34.85%	+12.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.47%	-77.51%	+47.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.27%	-77.51%	+40.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.15%	-51.33%	+48.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.14%	-40.34%	-3.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.87%	15.51%	-6.64%

Volatility

XME vs. AMR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) is 12.36%, while Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) has a volatility of 19.30%. This indicates that XME experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XME	AMR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.36%	19.30%	-6.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.73%	40.42%	-13.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.61%	60.76%	-26.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.54%	59.88%	-27.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.84%	73.71%	-40.87%

Dividends

XME vs. AMR - Dividend Comparison

XME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, while AMR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMR Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.57%	4.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF	0.30%	0.38%	0.65%	1.00%	1.64%	0.70%	0.99%	2.43%	2.23%	1.15%	1.02%	2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XME and AMR in my portfolio?

XME and AMR have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XME or AMR?

AMR has higher volatility (19.30%) compared to XME (12.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XME dropped -85.89% vs AMR's -97.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.