PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMAG vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMAG vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMAG achieves a 12.36% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 20.36% return.


XMAG

1D
-0.04%
1M
-1.41%
6M
10.62%
YTD
12.36%
1Y
21.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.93%

VGT

1D
-0.38%
1M
-1.30%
6M
21.30%
YTD
20.36%
1Y
34.81%
3Y*
26.48%
5Y*
17.81%
10Y*
24.06%
ALL TIME*
14.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$440.89M$515.41M$573.34M
$1.40M$2.49M$1.91M

XMAG vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XMAG
Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF
12.36%15.63%-1.52%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
20.36%21.77%2.57%

Correlation

The correlation between XMAG and VGT is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2024

0.73

The correlation between XMAG and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

XMAG vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XMAG
VGT

Technology

25.8%
98.6%

Financial Services

17.7%
0.5%

Healthcare

13.8%
0.0%

Industrials

11.5%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.9%

-

Energy

5.3%
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
0.1%

Utilities

4.0%

-

Communication Services

3.0%
0.5%

Real Estate

2.9%

-

Basic Materials

2.6%
0.0%

Technology

XMAG
25.8%
VGT
98.6%

Financial Services

XMAG
17.7%
VGT
0.5%

Healthcare

XMAG
13.8%
VGT
0.0%

Industrials

XMAG
11.5%
VGT
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

XMAG
6.9%
VGT

-

Energy

XMAG
5.3%
VGT
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XMAG
5.3%
VGT
0.1%

Utilities

XMAG
4.0%
VGT

-

Communication Services

XMAG
3.0%
VGT
0.5%

Real Estate

XMAG
2.9%
VGT

-

Basic Materials

XMAG
2.6%
VGT
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMAG vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XMAG
XMAG Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
XMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
XMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XMAG vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XMAGVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.23

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

1.94

+0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.56

5.23

+6.33

XMAG vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMAG Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMAG and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XMAG vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMAG drawdown since its inception was -16.17%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMAG and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMAGVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.17%

-54.63%

+38.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

-16.40%

+9.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.76%

-9.93%

+7.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.07%

-7.95%

+5.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

6.07%

-4.32%

Volatility

XMAG vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF (XMAG) is 3.55%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 8.42%. This indicates that XMAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMAGVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

8.42%

-4.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.62%

20.14%

-10.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.06%

24.28%

-12.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.03%

25.83%

-10.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.03%

24.89%

-9.86%

XMAG vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMAG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMAG vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

XMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, more than VGT's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.38%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%
XMAG
Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF
0.46%0.51%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMAG and VGT have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to XMAG (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMAG dropped -16.17% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 1-year performance, VGT leads with 34.81% vs 21.36% for XMAG. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, XMAG has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VGT has performed better with a 34.81% return vs 21.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMAG.

XMAG has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.38% for VGT.

XMAG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. XMAG tracks BITA US 500 ex Magnificent 7 Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMAG and 0.09% for VGT.

XMAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMAG and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer