XLUP.L vs. SPYG
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (XLUP.L) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG).
XLUP.L and SPYG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLUP.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Utilities NR USD. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. SPYG is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2000. Both XLUP.L and SPYG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XLUP.L or SPYG.
Key characteristics
| XLUP.L | SPYG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 24.59% | 35.25% |
| 1Y Return | 26.97% | 46.54% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 10.35% | 8.21% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.58% | 18.21% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 10.45% | 15.29% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.90 | 2.66 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.63 | 3.40 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.32 | 1.48 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.99 | 2.75 |
| Martin Ratio | 8.30 | 14.14 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.23% | 3.20% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.02% | 17.04% |
| Max Drawdown | -29.94% | -67.79% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.04% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLUP.L and SPYG is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
XLUP.L vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XLUP.L achieves a 24.59% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 35.25% return. Over the past 10 years, XLUP.L has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 10.45%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 15.29% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XLUP.L vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLUP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XLUP.L vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (XLUP.L) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XLUP.L vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
XLUP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLUP.L Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYG SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.65% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.36% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% | 1.37% | 1.42% |
Drawdowns
XLUP.L vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLUP.L drawdown since its inception was -29.94%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLUP.L and SPYG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XLUP.L vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (XLUP.L) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) have volatilities of 5.04% and 5.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.