PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLM-USD vs. ETH-USD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XLM-USD vs. ETH-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stellar (XLM-USD) and Ethereum (ETH-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XLM-USD vs. ETH-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLM-USD
Stellar
-18.72%-39.55%157.40%81.66%-73.35%108.68%184.76%-60.36%-68.37%14,396.90%
ETH-USD
Ethereum
-30.81%-10.91%46.00%90.84%-67.48%398.30%473.88%-1.52%-82.39%8,984.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLM-USD achieves a -18.72% return, which is significantly higher than ETH-USD's -30.81% return. Over the past 10 years, XLM-USD has underperformed ETH-USD with an annualized return of 53.22%, while ETH-USD has yielded a comparatively higher 68.46% annualized return.


XLM-USD

1D
-3.63%
1M
7.63%
YTD
-18.72%
6M
-60.10%
1Y
-36.80%
3Y*
15.25%
5Y*
-16.77%
10Y*
53.22%

ETH-USD

1D
-4.09%
1M
3.52%
YTD
-30.81%
6M
-54.26%
1Y
14.38%
3Y*
4.27%
5Y*
0.43%
10Y*
68.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLM-USD vs. ETH-USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLM-USD
XLM-USD Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
XLM-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

ETH-USD
ETH-USD Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ETH-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETH-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETH-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ETH-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETH-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLM-USD vs. ETH-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stellar (XLM-USD) and Ethereum (ETH-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLM-USDETH-USDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.49

0.19

-0.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.37

0.85

-1.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.09

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-1.11

-0.92

-0.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.69

-1.58

-0.12

XLM-USD vs. ETH-USD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLM-USD Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is lower than the ETH-USD Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLM-USD and ETH-USD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLM-USDETH-USDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.49

0.19

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.18

0.01

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.72

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.79

-0.47

Correlation

The correlation between XLM-USD and ETH-USD is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Drawdowns

XLM-USD vs. ETH-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLM-USD drawdown since its inception was -96.21%, roughly equal to the maximum ETH-USD drawdown of -94.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLM-USD and ETH-USD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XLM-USDETH-USDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.21%

-94.01%

-2.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-70.49%

-62.26%

-8.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.35%

-79.35%

-11.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.21%

-94.01%

-2.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.50%

-57.51%

-23.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-72.00%

-50.82%

-21.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

44.31%

36.50%

+7.81%

Volatility

XLM-USD vs. ETH-USD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Stellar (XLM-USD) is 15.66%, while Ethereum (ETH-USD) has a volatility of 18.12%. This indicates that XLM-USD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETH-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XLM-USDETH-USDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.66%

18.12%

-2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.47%

51.50%

-2.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.78%

62.47%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

77.57%

63.54%

+14.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

112.23%

78.86%

+33.37%