XLM-USD vs. BNB-USD
XLM-USD (Stellar) and BNB-USD (BNB) are both cryptocurrencies. Over the past 5 years, XLM-USD returned -9.49%/yr vs 11.95%/yr for BNB-USD. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
XLM-USD vs. BNB-USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLM-USD achieves a -15.10% return, which is significantly higher than BNB-USD's -31.83% return.
XLM-USD
- 1D
- -2.09%
- 1M
- -17.48%
- 6M
- -4.53%
- YTD
- -15.10%
- 1Y
- -57.33%
- 3Y*
- 7.76%
- 5Y*
- -9.49%
- 10Y*
- 56.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 40.13%
BNB-USD
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- 6M
- -23.91%
- YTD
- -31.83%
- 1Y
- -21.63%
- 3Y*
- 34.60%
- 5Y*
- 11.95%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 91.19%
Liquidity Comparison
XLM-USD vs. BNB-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
Correlation
The correlation between XLM-USD and BNB-USD is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017 | 0.59 |
The correlation between XLM-USD and BNB-USD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLM-USD vs. BNB-USD — Risk / Return Rank
XLM-USD
BNB-USD
XLM-USD vs. BNB-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stellar (XLM-USD) and BNB (BNB-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLM-USD | BNB-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.97 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | -0.37 | -0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.13 | -0.53 | -0.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLM-USD vs. BNB-USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLM-USD drawdown since its inception was -96.21%, which is greater than BNB-USD's maximum drawdown of -79.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLM-USD and BNB-USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLM-USD | BNB-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.21% | -79.74% | -16.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.28% | -58.25% | -10.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.37% | -58.25% | -16.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.25% | -69.89% | -13.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.67% | -54.97% | -25.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.21% | -38.98% | -33.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.87% | 30.12% | -0.25% |
Volatility
XLM-USD vs. BNB-USD - Volatility Comparison
Stellar (XLM-USD) has a higher volatility of 12.92% compared to BNB (BNB-USD) at 7.28%. This indicates that XLM-USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNB-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLM-USD | BNB-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.92% | 7.28% | +5.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.14% | 32.77% | +26.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.47% | 43.97% | +21.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.98% | 48.94% | +25.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 112.04% | 79.47% | +32.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLM-USD and BNB-USD have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLM-USD has higher volatility (12.92%) compared to BNB-USD (7.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLM-USD dropped -96.21% vs BNB-USD's -79.74%.
BNB-USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.41 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLM-USD and BNB-USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer