XLKQ.L vs. XLG

In the year-to-date period, XLKQ.L achieves a 37.51% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's 29.52% return. Over the past 10 years, XLKQ.L has outperformed XLG with an annualized return of 24.03%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively lower 14.82% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

XLKQ.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Technology Sector UCITS ETF (XLKQ.L) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLKQ.L and XLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

XLKQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%.

The maximum XLKQ.L drawdown since its inception was -23.83%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLKQ.L and XLG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Invesco US Technology Sector UCITS ETF (XLKQ.L) has a higher volatility of 5.72% compared to Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 4.94%. This indicates that XLKQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.