XLKQ.L vs. VGT
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco US Technology Sector UCITS ETF (XLKQ.L) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT).
XLKQ.L and VGT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLKQ.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. VGT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. Both XLKQ.L and VGT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XLKQ.L or VGT.
Key characteristics
| XLKQ.L | VGT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 22.65% | 13.79% |
| 1Y Return | 33.03% | 23.76% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 18.49% | 9.43% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 24.04% | 21.31% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 23.62% | 19.77% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.59 | 1.18 |
| Daily Std Dev | 20.02% | 20.65% |
| Max Drawdown | -23.83% | -54.63% |
| Current Drawdown | -10.39% | -9.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLKQ.L and VGT is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XLKQ.L vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XLKQ.L achieves a 22.65% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's 13.79% return. Over the past 10 years, XLKQ.L has outperformed VGT with an annualized return of 23.62%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively lower 19.77% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XLKQ.L vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLKQ.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XLKQ.L vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Technology Sector UCITS ETF (XLKQ.L) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XLKQ.L vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
XLKQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLKQ.L Invesco US Technology Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.67% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% | 1.12% | 1.05% |
Drawdowns
XLKQ.L vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLKQ.L drawdown since its inception was -23.83%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLKQ.L and VGT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XLKQ.L vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco US Technology Sector UCITS ETF (XLKQ.L) is 6.23%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 8.09%. This indicates that XLKQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.