PortfoliosLab logo
XLG vs. PBUS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between XLG and PBUS is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

XLG vs. PBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

XLG:

9.67%

PBUS:

9.85%

Max Drawdown

XLG:

-0.80%

PBUS:

-0.80%

Current Drawdown

XLG:

-0.04%

PBUS:

-0.02%

Returns By Period


XLG

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

PBUS

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XLG vs. PBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than PBUS's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

XLG vs. PBUS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLG is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLG is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLG is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLG is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLG is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLG is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

PBUS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PBUS is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PBUS is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PBUS is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PBUS is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PBUS is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PBUS is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

XLG vs. PBUS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG) and Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF (PBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

XLG vs. PBUS - Dividend Comparison

XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than PBUS's 1.27% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
XLG
Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF
0.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PBUS
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF
1.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XLG vs. PBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLG drawdown since its inception was -0.80%, roughly equal to the maximum PBUS drawdown of -0.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLG and PBUS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

XLG vs. PBUS - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...