XLG vs. IWB
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB).
XLG and IWB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell Top 50 Index. It was launched on May 10, 2005. IWB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Index. It was launched on May 15, 2000. Both XLG and IWB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XLG or IWB.
Correlation
The correlation between XLG and IWB is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XLG vs. IWB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XLG:
2.24
IWB:
1.87
XLG:
2.92
IWB:
2.51
XLG:
1.41
IWB:
1.35
XLG:
2.98
IWB:
2.81
XLG:
12.32
IWB:
12.25
XLG:
2.74%
IWB:
1.94%
XLG:
15.08%
IWB:
12.69%
XLG:
-52.39%
IWB:
-55.38%
XLG:
-3.08%
IWB:
-4.28%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLG achieves a 33.36% return, which is significantly higher than IWB's 23.62% return. Over the past 10 years, XLG has outperformed IWB with an annualized return of 15.12%, while IWB has yielded a comparatively lower 12.59% annualized return.
XLG
33.36%
2.50%
8.84%
33.15%
17.95%
15.12%
IWB
23.62%
-1.14%
8.31%
25.61%
14.10%
12.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XLG vs. IWB - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IWB's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XLG vs. IWB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XLG vs. IWB - Dividend Comparison
XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than IWB's 0.83% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLG Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF | 0.54% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% | 1.97% | 1.97% |
IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | 0.83% | 1.31% | 1.56% | 1.09% | 1.37% | 1.71% | 2.06% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 1.95% | 1.71% | 1.68% |
Drawdowns
XLG vs. IWB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLG drawdown since its inception was -52.39%, smaller than the maximum IWB drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLG and IWB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XLG vs. IWB - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) have volatilities of 4.00% and 3.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.