PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
XLFQ.L vs. V
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


XLFQ.LV
YTD Return29.91%18.93%
1Y Return40.83%28.14%
3Y Return (Ann)10.60%13.90%
5Y Return (Ann)12.20%12.27%
10Y Return (Ann)13.58%18.16%
Sharpe Ratio2.941.63
Sortino Ratio4.492.18
Omega Ratio1.571.31
Calmar Ratio4.632.16
Martin Ratio21.575.50
Ulcer Index1.87%4.90%
Daily Std Dev13.65%16.53%
Max Drawdown-35.39%-51.90%
Current Drawdown-0.09%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between XLFQ.L and V is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

XLFQ.L vs. V - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, XLFQ.L achieves a 29.91% return, which is significantly higher than V's 18.93% return. Over the past 10 years, XLFQ.L has underperformed V with an annualized return of 13.58%, while V has yielded a comparatively higher 18.16% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
271.44%
629.99%
XLFQ.L
V

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

XLFQ.L vs. V - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF (XLFQ.L) and Visa Inc. (V). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLFQ.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XLFQ.L, currently valued at 3.42, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.42
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XLFQ.L, currently valued at 4.86, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.004.86
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XLFQ.L, currently valued at 1.65, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.65
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XLFQ.L, currently valued at 3.29, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.29
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XLFQ.L, currently valued at 23.04, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0023.04
V
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for V, currently valued at 1.50, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.50
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for V, currently valued at 2.02, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.02
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for V, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.29
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for V, currently valued at 1.97, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.97
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for V, currently valued at 4.97, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.004.97

XLFQ.L vs. V - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLFQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is higher than the V Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLFQ.L and V, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.42
1.50
XLFQ.L
V

Dividends

XLFQ.L vs. V - Dividend Comparison

XLFQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while V's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
XLFQ.L
Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
V
Visa Inc.
0.51%0.72%0.76%0.62%0.56%0.56%0.67%0.61%0.75%0.64%0.64%0.62%

Drawdowns

XLFQ.L vs. V - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLFQ.L drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, smaller than the maximum V drawdown of -51.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLFQ.L and V. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember00
XLFQ.L
V

Volatility

XLFQ.L vs. V - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF (XLFQ.L) is 6.03%, while Visa Inc. (V) has a volatility of 6.59%. This indicates that XLFQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than V based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.03%
6.59%
XLFQ.L
V