PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLC vs. XLRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLC vs. XLRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLC achieves a -8.97% return, which is significantly lower than XLRE's 12.02% return.


XLC

1D
-0.68%
1M
-7.49%
YTD
-8.97%
6M
-9.26%
1Y
2.52%
3Y*
19.82%
5Y*
6.82%
10Y*

XLRE

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.76%
YTD
12.02%
6M
11.78%
1Y
8.96%
3Y*
11.20%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*
6.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLC vs. XLRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XLC
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund
-8.97%23.08%34.71%52.82%-37.63%15.96%26.90%31.05%-16.45%
XLRE
Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund
12.02%2.63%5.09%12.36%-26.25%46.10%-2.18%28.68%0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between XLC and XLRE is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018

0.46

The correlation between XLC and XLRE shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLC vs. XLRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLC
XLC Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
XLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLC Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
XLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLC Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

XLRE
XLRE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
XLRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLRE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLRE Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLC vs. XLRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLCXLREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.12

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

1.08

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.69

2.98

-2.29

XLC vs. XLRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLC Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the XLRE Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLC and XLRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLC vs. XLRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLC drawdown since its inception was -46.65%, which is greater than XLRE's maximum drawdown of -38.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLC and XLRE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLCXLREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.65%

-38.83%

-7.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.76%

-8.33%

-2.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.97%

-16.74%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.65%

-34.12%

-12.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.76%

-1.01%

-9.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.57%

-9.56%

-1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.64%

3.04%

+0.60%

Volatility

XLC vs. XLRE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) is 4.68%, while Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE) has a volatility of 5.36%. This indicates that XLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLCXLREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

5.36%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.26%

10.63%

-0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.50%

14.10%

-0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.73%

19.13%

+1.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.17%

20.44%

+1.73%

XLC vs. XLRE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XLC and XLRE have an expense ratio of 0.13%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLC vs. XLRE - Dividend Comparison

XLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than XLRE's 3.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XLC
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.34%1.13%0.99%0.82%1.10%0.74%0.68%0.82%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLRE
Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund
3.16%3.45%3.43%3.31%3.70%2.61%3.15%3.06%3.78%3.25%4.22%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLC and XLRE have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLRE has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to XLC (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLC dropped -46.65% vs XLRE's -38.83%.

On 5-year performance, XLC leads with 6.82% vs 3.32% for XLRE. Both ETFs have the same 0.13% expense ratio. On volatility, XLC has been the lower-risk option at 4.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XLC has performed better with a 6.82% return vs 3.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLC and XLRE have the same expense ratio: 0.13% per year.

XLRE has the higher dividend yield at 3.16%, compared with 1.34% for XLC.

XLC is categorized as Communications Equities, while XLRE is REIT. XLC tracks S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index, while XLRE tracks Real Estate Select Sector Index.

XLRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLC and XLRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer