PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLB vs. JNK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLB vs. JNK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) and SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLB achieves a 14.35% return, which is significantly higher than JNK's 1.51% return. Over the past 10 years, XLB has outperformed JNK with an annualized return of 10.23%, while JNK has yielded a comparatively lower 5.01% annualized return.


XLB

1D
0.21%
1M
1.93%
YTD
14.35%
6M
17.15%
1Y
19.99%
3Y*
11.71%
5Y*
5.35%
10Y*
10.23%

JNK

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.44%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.97%
1Y
7.24%
3Y*
8.63%
5Y*
3.68%
10Y*
5.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLB vs. JNK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
14.35%9.94%0.15%12.46%-12.30%27.44%20.46%24.13%-14.88%24.01%
JNK
SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF
1.51%8.76%7.71%12.42%-12.19%4.00%4.95%14.88%-3.28%6.49%

Correlation

The correlation between XLB and JNK is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2007

0.56

The correlation between XLB and JNK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLB vs. JNK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLB
JNK

Basic Materials

87.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%

-

Industrials

1.5%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

XLB
87.6%
JNK

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLB
12.4%
JNK

-

Industrials

XLB
1.5%
JNK

-

Communication Services

XLB

-

JNK

-

Consumer Defensive

XLB

-

JNK

-

Energy

XLB

-

JNK
0.0%

Financial Services

XLB

-

JNK

-

Healthcare

XLB

-

JNK

-

Real Estate

XLB

-

JNK

-

Technology

XLB

-

JNK
0.0%

Utilities

XLB

-

JNK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLB vs. JNK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLB
XLB Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
XLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLB Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
XLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLB Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

JNK
JNK Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
JNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNK Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
JNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNK Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLB vs. JNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) and SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLBJNKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.36

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

2.90

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.06

12.79

-7.73

XLB vs. JNK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLB Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the JNK Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLB and JNK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLBJNKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

1.90

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.49

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.60

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.42

-0.06

Drawdowns

XLB vs. JNK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLB drawdown since its inception was -59.83%, which is greater than JNK's maximum drawdown of -38.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLB and JNK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLBJNKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.83%

-38.48%

-21.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.38%

-2.51%

-9.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.17%

-5.02%

-18.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.72%

-16.67%

-8.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.27%

-22.89%

-14.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.28%

-0.26%

-3.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.84%

-3.70%

-7.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.96%

0.57%

+3.39%

Volatility

XLB vs. JNK - Volatility Comparison

Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) at 1.13%. This indicates that XLB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLBJNKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.73%

1.13%

+4.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.85%

2.97%

+9.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.78%

3.82%

+12.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.94%

7.54%

+11.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.65%

8.31%

+12.34%

XLB vs. JNK - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLB has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than JNK's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLB vs. JNK - Dividend Comparison

XLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than JNK's 6.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JNK
SPDR Barclays High Yield Bond ETF
6.62%6.54%6.63%6.38%6.06%4.27%5.11%5.44%5.90%5.60%6.06%6.59%
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.69%1.92%1.92%2.00%2.26%1.62%1.72%1.98%2.20%1.66%1.95%2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLB and JNK have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLB has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to JNK (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLB dropped -59.83% vs JNK's -38.48%.

On 10-year performance, XLB leads with 10.23% vs 5.01% for JNK. On fees, XLB is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, JNK has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLB has performed better with a 10.23% return vs 5.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLB is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for JNK.

JNK has the higher dividend yield at 6.62%, compared with 1.69% for XLB.

XLB is categorized as Materials, while JNK is High Yield Bonds. XLB tracks Materials Select Sector Index, while JNK tracks Barclays Capital High Yield Very Liquid Index. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLB and 0.40% for JNK.

JNK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLB and JNK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer