XJR vs. SCHA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA).
XJR and SCHA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XJR is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2020. SCHA is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009. Both XJR and SCHA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XJR or SCHA.
Correlation
The correlation between XJR and SCHA is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XJR vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XJR:
0.91
SCHA:
1.07
XJR:
1.43
SCHA:
1.57
XJR:
1.17
SCHA:
1.19
XJR:
1.48
SCHA:
1.46
XJR:
4.80
SCHA:
5.40
XJR:
3.88%
SCHA:
3.80%
XJR:
20.50%
SCHA:
19.09%
XJR:
-26.89%
SCHA:
-42.41%
XJR:
-6.48%
SCHA:
-5.67%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XJR achieves a 2.19% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 2.67% return.
XJR
2.19%
1.42%
5.72%
15.80%
N/A
N/A
SCHA
2.67%
2.79%
7.39%
19.76%
8.68%
9.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XJR vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
XJR has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XJR vs. SCHA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
XJR
SCHA
XJR vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XJR vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison
XJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, more than SCHA's 1.47% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XJR iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF | 1.92% | 1.96% | 0.92% | 1.29% | 2.00% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 1.47% | 1.51% | 2.56% | 1.90% | 1.48% | 1.52% | 2.78% | 1.62% | 1.78% | 2.62% | 2.25% | 1.80% |
Drawdowns
XJR vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XJR drawdown since its inception was -26.89%, smaller than the maximum SCHA drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJR and SCHA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XJR vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) is 5.93%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 6.27%. This indicates that XJR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.