XJR vs. SCHA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA).
XJR and SCHA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XJR is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2020. SCHA is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009. Both XJR and SCHA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XJR or SCHA.
Correlation
The correlation between XJR and SCHA is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XJR vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
XJR:
17.16%
SCHA:
23.69%
XJR:
-0.66%
SCHA:
-42.41%
XJR:
-0.03%
SCHA:
-15.79%
Returns By Period
XJR
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
SCHA
-8.34%
9.39%
-13.78%
0.33%
12.35%
7.21%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XJR vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
XJR has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XJR vs. SCHA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
XJR
SCHA
XJR vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
XJR vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison
XJR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XJR iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 1.66% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.62% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% | 1.45% |
Drawdowns
XJR vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XJR drawdown since its inception was -0.66%, smaller than the maximum SCHA drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJR and SCHA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
XJR vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison
Loading data...