XJR vs. FNDA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA).
XJR and FNDA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XJR is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2020. FNDA is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell RAFI Small Company US. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. Both XJR and FNDA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XJR or FNDA.
Correlation
The correlation between XJR and FNDA is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XJR vs. FNDA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XJR:
0.62
FNDA:
0.64
XJR:
1.04
FNDA:
1.02
XJR:
1.12
FNDA:
1.13
XJR:
1.01
FNDA:
1.31
XJR:
3.49
FNDA:
3.35
XJR:
3.66%
FNDA:
3.53%
XJR:
20.61%
FNDA:
18.35%
XJR:
-26.89%
FNDA:
-44.64%
XJR:
-7.88%
FNDA:
-7.66%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XJR achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly higher than FNDA's 9.69% return.
XJR
10.32%
-4.72%
12.17%
10.40%
N/A
N/A
FNDA
9.69%
-3.25%
10.78%
10.08%
10.24%
9.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XJR vs. FNDA - Expense Ratio Comparison
XJR has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDA's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XJR vs. FNDA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XJR vs. FNDA - Dividend Comparison
XJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than FNDA's 2.24% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XJR iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF | 1.94% | 0.92% | 1.29% | 2.00% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF | 2.24% | 1.83% | 2.76% | 2.10% | 2.13% | 2.76% | 2.80% | 1.61% | 1.52% | 1.99% | 1.33% | 0.58% |
Drawdowns
XJR vs. FNDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XJR drawdown since its inception was -26.89%, smaller than the maximum FNDA drawdown of -44.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJR and FNDA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XJR vs. FNDA - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) have volatilities of 5.73% and 5.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.