XJH vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
XJH and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XJH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2020. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both XJH and VOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XJH vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XJH vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XJH iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 2.75% | 8.12% | 12.27% | 16.74% | -14.36% | 23.43% | 29.59% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -3.66% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 16.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XJH achieves a 2.75% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -3.66% return.
XJH
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -5.67%
- YTD
- 2.75%
- 6M
- 5.01%
- 1Y
- 18.09%
- 3Y*
- 11.87%
- 5Y*
- 6.04%
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -4.29%
- YTD
- -3.66%
- 6M
- -1.41%
- 1Y
- 18.17%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 11.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XJH vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XJH has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XJH vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
XJH
VOO
XJH vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XJH | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 1.01 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 1.53 | -0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.23 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 1.55 | -0.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.54 | 7.31 | -1.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XJH | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 1.01 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.71 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.83 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between XJH and VOO is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XJH vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
XJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, more than VOO's 1.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XJH iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.22% | 1.24% | 1.24% | 1.38% | 1.45% | 1.04% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.18% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
XJH vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XJH drawdown since its inception was -25.07%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJH and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XJH | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.07% | -33.99% | +8.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.02% | -11.98% | -2.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.07% | -24.52% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.95% | -5.55% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.99% | -3.72% | -3.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 2.55% | +0.82% |
Volatility
XJH vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) has a higher volatility of 6.71% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 5.34%. This indicates that XJH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XJH | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.71% | 5.34% | +1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.27% | 9.47% | +2.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.39% | 18.11% | +3.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.89% | 16.82% | +3.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.99% | 17.99% | +2.00% |