PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XJH vs. VOE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XJH vs. VOE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XJH achieves a 11.87% return, which is significantly higher than VOE's 10.76% return.


XJH

1D
-2.05%
1M
-0.88%
YTD
11.87%
6M
11.82%
1Y
24.57%
3Y*
14.70%
5Y*
7.22%
10Y*

VOE

1D
-0.90%
1M
0.77%
YTD
10.76%
6M
11.37%
1Y
23.68%
3Y*
16.27%
5Y*
8.45%
10Y*
10.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XJH vs. VOE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XJH
iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF
11.87%8.12%12.27%16.74%-14.36%23.43%29.59%
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
10.76%12.08%14.00%9.85%-7.97%28.78%22.22%

Correlation

The correlation between XJH and VOE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020

0.91

The correlation between XJH and VOE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

XJH vs. VOE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XJH
VOE

Industrials

25.9%
14.0%

Technology

16.0%
10.9%

Financial Services

14.8%
16.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
5.7%

Healthcare

9.6%
6.3%

Real Estate

8.2%
6.0%

Basic Materials

4.9%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
7.9%

Energy

2.9%
12.8%

Utilities

1.6%
12.1%

Communication Services

1.1%
2.2%

Industrials

XJH
25.9%
VOE
14.0%

Technology

XJH
16.0%
VOE
10.9%

Financial Services

XJH
14.8%
VOE
16.5%

Consumer Cyclical

XJH
11.3%
VOE
5.7%

Healthcare

XJH
9.6%
VOE
6.3%

Real Estate

XJH
8.2%
VOE
6.0%

Basic Materials

XJH
4.9%
VOE
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

XJH
3.8%
VOE
7.9%

Energy

XJH
2.9%
VOE
12.8%

Utilities

XJH
1.6%
VOE
12.1%

Communication Services

XJH
1.1%
VOE
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XJH vs. VOE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XJH
XJH Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XJH Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
XJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
XJH Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

VOE
VOE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOE Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XJH vs. VOE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XJHVOEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.36

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

3.43

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.44

13.02

-3.58

XJH vs. VOE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XJH Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the VOE Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XJH and VOE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XJHVOEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

2.07

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.53

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.44

+0.30

Drawdowns

XJH vs. VOE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XJH drawdown since its inception was -25.07%, smaller than the maximum VOE drawdown of -61.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJH and VOE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XJHVOEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.07%

-61.50%

+36.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

-6.93%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.56%

-18.45%

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.07%

-19.70%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.05%

-0.90%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.82%

-8.35%

+1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

1.82%

+0.79%

Volatility

XJH vs. VOE - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) at 2.86%. This indicates that XJH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XJHVOEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

2.86%

+1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.07%

8.19%

+3.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.39%

11.50%

+4.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.94%

16.04%

+3.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.89%

18.83%

+1.06%

XJH vs. VOE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XJH has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VOE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XJH vs. VOE - Dividend Comparison

XJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than VOE's 1.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.88%2.10%2.11%2.27%2.27%1.78%2.36%2.05%2.75%1.86%1.92%2.05%
XJH
iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF
1.12%1.24%1.24%1.38%1.45%1.04%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XJH and VOE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XJH has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to VOE (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJH dropped -25.07% vs VOE's -61.50%.

On 5-year performance, VOE leads with 8.45% vs 7.22% for XJH. On fees, VOE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VOE has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOE has performed better with a 8.45% return vs 7.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XJH.

VOE has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 1.12% for XJH.

XJH is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VOE is Mid Cap Value Equities. XJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index, while VOE tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XJH and 0.05% for VOE.

VOE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XJH and VOE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer