XIU.TO vs. SPYG
XIU.TO (iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XIU.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX 60 Index, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XIU.TO returned 12.62%/yr vs 19.06%/yr for SPYG. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XIU.TO charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
XIU.TO vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XIU.TO is traded in CAD, while SPYG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPYG values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XIU.TO achieves a 10.14% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 15.20% return. Over the past 10 years, XIU.TO has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 12.62%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 19.06% annualized return.
XIU.TO
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 3.47%
- YTD
- 10.14%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 31.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.48%
- 5Y*
- 14.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.62%
SPYG
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 9.52%
- YTD
- 15.20%
- 6M
- 13.13%
- 1Y
- 35.68%
- 3Y*
- 29.65%
- 5Y*
- 19.39%
- 10Y*
- 19.06%
XIU.TO vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XIU.TO iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF | 10.14% | 28.89% | 20.73% | 11.85% | -6.35% | 28.06% | 5.27% | 21.81% | -7.82% | 9.58% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 15.20% | 16.49% | 47.68% | 27.16% | -24.38% | 30.82% | 31.21% | 24.41% | 8.35% | 19.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between XIU.TO and SPYG is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009 | 0.52 |
The correlation between XIU.TO and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
XIU.TO vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XIU.TO
SPYG
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
XIU.TO
SPYG
Energy
XIU.TO
SPYG
Basic Materials
XIU.TO
SPYG
Technology
XIU.TO
SPYG
Industrials
XIU.TO
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
XIU.TO
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
XIU.TO
SPYG
Utilities
XIU.TO
SPYG
Communication Services
XIU.TO
SPYG
Real Estate
XIU.TO
SPYG
Healthcare
XIU.TO
-
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XIU.TO vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
XIU.TO
SPYG
XIU.TO vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XIU.TO | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.41 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.16 | 2.57 | +1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.30 | 9.03 | +10.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XIU.TO | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 2.28 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.13 | 1.00 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | 1.00 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 1.12 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
XIU.TO vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XIU.TO drawdown since its inception was -52.31%, which is greater than SPYG's maximum drawdown of -30.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIU.TO and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XIU.TO | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.31% | -30.32% | -21.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.65% | -13.96% | +6.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.36% | -22.76% | +10.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.36% | -30.32% | +13.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.46% | -30.32% | -5.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -0.57% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.63% | -4.49% | -7.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 3.96% | -2.32% |
Volatility
XIU.TO vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF (XIU.TO) is 3.28%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 4.20%. This indicates that XIU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XIU.TO | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 4.20% | -0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.32% | 12.08% | -2.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.73% | 15.72% | -3.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.78% | 19.47% | -6.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 19.10% | -4.09% |
XIU.TO vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XIU.TO has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XIU.TO vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
XIU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, more than SPYG's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
XIU.TO iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index ETF | 2.20% | 2.39% | 2.92% | 3.16% | 3.02% | 2.43% | 3.03% | 2.87% | 3.18% | 2.58% | 2.65% | 3.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XIU.TO and SPYG have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for XIU.TO.
XIU.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. XIU.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XIU.TO and 0.04% for SPYG.
Find the right allocation for XIU.TO and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer