PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XITK vs. FTLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XITK vs. FTLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XITK achieves a 13.97% return, which is significantly higher than FTLS's 5.34% return. Over the past 10 years, XITK has outperformed FTLS with an annualized return of 14.35%, while FTLS has yielded a comparatively lower 9.83% annualized return.


XITK

1D
-3.51%
1M
12.45%
YTD
13.97%
6M
14.17%
1Y
11.38%
3Y*
17.58%
5Y*
-0.31%
10Y*
14.35%

FTLS

1D
0.12%
1M
2.01%
YTD
5.34%
6M
5.22%
1Y
14.27%
3Y*
14.31%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*
9.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XITK vs. FTLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XITK
SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF
13.97%2.53%19.12%45.87%-47.45%-11.24%90.22%36.98%7.60%36.01%
FTLS
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
5.34%9.09%18.80%16.94%-5.56%19.65%2.56%16.16%-4.81%14.41%

Correlation

The correlation between XITK and FTLS is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2016

0.59

The correlation between XITK and FTLS shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.60 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XITK vs. FTLS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XITK
FTLS

Technology

83.4%
26.9%

Communication Services

8.6%
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

2.2%
9.5%

Industrials

2.0%
7.6%

Financial Services

1.7%
19.9%

Healthcare

1.6%
8.4%

Real Estate

0.5%
1.9%

Basic Materials

-

5.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.5%

Energy

-

7.3%

Utilities

-

0.9%

Technology

XITK
83.4%
FTLS
26.9%

Communication Services

XITK
8.6%
FTLS
6.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XITK
2.2%
FTLS
9.5%

Industrials

XITK
2.0%
FTLS
7.6%

Financial Services

XITK
1.7%
FTLS
19.9%

Healthcare

XITK
1.6%
FTLS
8.4%

Real Estate

XITK
0.5%
FTLS
1.9%

Basic Materials

XITK

-

FTLS
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

XITK

-

FTLS
6.5%

Energy

XITK

-

FTLS
7.3%

Utilities

XITK

-

FTLS
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XITK vs. FTLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XITK
XITK Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
XITK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XITK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
XITK Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
XITK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XITK Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

FTLS
FTLS Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FTLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTLS Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FTLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTLS Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XITK vs. FTLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XITKFTLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.32

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

3.79

-3.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.95

11.78

-10.83

XITK vs. FTLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XITK Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the FTLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XITK and FTLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XITKFTLSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

1.75

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

0.98

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.87

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.81

-0.30

Drawdowns

XITK vs. FTLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XITK drawdown since its inception was -65.56%, which is greater than FTLS's maximum drawdown of -20.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XITK and FTLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XITKFTLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.56%

-20.54%

-45.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.03%

-3.79%

-24.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.18%

-11.69%

-16.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.53%

-11.69%

-49.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.56%

-20.54%

-45.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.29%

-0.03%

-22.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.08%

-2.69%

-19.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.96%

1.21%

+10.75%

Volatility

XITK vs. FTLS - Volatility Comparison

SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) has a higher volatility of 8.59% compared to First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF (FTLS) at 1.81%. This indicates that XITK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XITKFTLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.59%

1.81%

+6.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.87%

5.65%

+16.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.50%

8.18%

+18.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.63%

10.55%

+22.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.57%

11.30%

+18.27%

XITK vs. FTLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XITK has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FTLS's 1.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

XITK vs. FTLS - Dividend Comparison

XITK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTLS
First Trust Long/Short Equity ETF
0.90%1.07%1.50%1.49%0.81%0.01%0.44%0.83%0.87%0.43%1.04%0.49%
XITK
SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.11%0.00%0.06%0.14%1.50%1.74%1.88%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XITK and FTLS have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XITK has higher volatility (8.59%) compared to FTLS (1.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XITK dropped -65.56% vs FTLS's -20.54%.

On 10-year performance, XITK leads with 14.35% vs 9.83% for FTLS. On fees, XITK is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FTLS has been the lower-risk option at 1.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XITK has performed better with a 14.35% return vs 9.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XITK is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.60% for FTLS.

FTLS has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.00% for XITK.

XITK is categorized as Technology Equities, while FTLS is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XITK and 1.60% for FTLS.

FTLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XITK and FTLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer