PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
XINC.TO vs. SWDA.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


XINC.TOSWDA.L
YTD Return7.02%20.46%
1Y Return12.99%26.45%
3Y Return (Ann)1.11%9.05%
5Y Return (Ann)2.71%12.70%
Sharpe Ratio2.122.54
Sortino Ratio3.113.56
Omega Ratio1.421.49
Calmar Ratio1.364.21
Martin Ratio12.4418.59
Ulcer Index1.05%1.38%
Daily Std Dev6.19%10.05%
Max Drawdown-15.40%-25.58%
Current Drawdown-0.73%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between XINC.TO and SWDA.L is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

XINC.TO vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, XINC.TO achieves a 7.02% return, which is significantly lower than SWDA.L's 20.46% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.52%
9.22%
XINC.TO
SWDA.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XINC.TO vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XINC.TO and SWDA.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


XINC.TO
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio
Expense ratio chart for XINC.TO: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%
Expense ratio chart for SWDA.L: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XINC.TO vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio (XINC.TO) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XINC.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XINC.TO, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.17
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XINC.TO, currently valued at 1.68, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.68
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XINC.TO, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.21
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XINC.TO, currently valued at 0.56, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.56
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XINC.TO, currently valued at 3.45, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.003.45
SWDA.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SWDA.L, currently valued at 2.55, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.55
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SWDA.L, currently valued at 3.53, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.53
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SWDA.L, currently valued at 1.48, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.48
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SWDA.L, currently valued at 3.68, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.68
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SWDA.L, currently valued at 15.92, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0015.92

XINC.TO vs. SWDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XINC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XINC.TO and SWDA.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.17
2.55
XINC.TO
SWDA.L

Dividends

XINC.TO vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison

XINC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, while SWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20232022202120202019
XINC.TO
iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio
2.95%2.87%2.54%2.02%2.40%0.93%
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XINC.TO vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XINC.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.40%, smaller than the maximum SWDA.L drawdown of -25.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XINC.TO and SWDA.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-9.40%
-0.79%
XINC.TO
SWDA.L

Volatility

XINC.TO vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Income Balanced ETF Portfolio (XINC.TO) is 2.27%, while iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) has a volatility of 2.94%. This indicates that XINC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.27%
2.94%
XINC.TO
SWDA.L